section‹Metis Example Featuring the Transitive Closure›
theory Trans_Closure imports Main begin
declare [[metis_new_skolem]]
type_synonym addr = nat
datatype val
= Unit ― ‹dummy result value of void expressions›
| Null ― ‹null reference›
| Bool bool ― ‹Boolean value›
| Intg int ― ‹integer value›
| Addr addr ― ‹addresses of objects in the heap›
consts R :: "(addr × addr) set"
consts f :: "addr ==> val"
lemma"[f c = Intg x; ∀y. f b = Intg y ⟶ y ≠ x; (a, b) ∈ R*; (b, c) ∈ R*] ==>∃c. (b, c) ∈ R ∧ (a, c) ∈ R*" (* sledgehammer *) proof - assume A1: "f c = Intg x" assume A2: "∀y. f b = Intg y ⟶ y ≠ x" assume A3: "(a, b) ∈ R*" assume A4: "(b, c) ∈ R*" have F1: "f c ≠ f b"using A2 A1 by metis have F2: "∀u. (b, u) ∈ R ⟶ (a, u) ∈ R*"using A3 by (metis transitive_closure_trans(6)) have F3: "∃x. (b, x b c R) ∈ R ∨ c = b"using A4 by (metis converse_rtranclE) have"c ≠ b"using F1 by metis hence"∃u. (b, u) ∈ R"using F3 by metis thus"∃c. (b, c) ∈ R ∧ (a, c) ∈ R*"using F2 by metis qed
lemma"[f c = Intg x; ∀y. f b = Intg y ⟶ y ≠ x; (a, b) ∈ R*; (b,c) ∈ R*] ==>∃c. (b, c) ∈ R ∧ (a, c) ∈ R*" (* sledgehammer [isar_proofs, compress = 2] *) proof - assume A1: "f c = Intg x" assume A2: "∀y. f b = Intg y ⟶ y ≠ x" assume A3: "(a, b) ∈ R*" assume A4: "(b, c) ∈ R*" have"b ≠ c"using A1 A2 by metis hence"∃x1. (b, x1) ∈ R"using A4 by (metis converse_rtranclE) thus"∃c. (b, c) ∈ R ∧ (a, c) ∈ R*"using A3 by (metis transitive_closure_trans(6)) qed
lemma"[f c = Intg x; ∀y. f b = Intg y ⟶ y ≠ x; (a, b) ∈ R*; (b, c) ∈ R*] ==>∃c. (b, c) ∈ R ∧ (a, c) ∈ R*" apply (erule_tac x = b in converse_rtranclE) apply metis by (metis transitive_closure_trans(6))
end
Messung V0.5 in Prozent
¤ Dauer der Verarbeitung: 0.1 Sekunden
(vorverarbeitet am 2026-06-10)
¤
Die Informationen auf dieser Webseite wurden
nach bestem Wissen sorgfältig zusammengestellt. Es wird jedoch weder Vollständigkeit, noch Richtigkeit,
noch Qualität der bereit gestellten Informationen zugesichert.
Bemerkung:
Die farbliche Syntaxdarstellung und die Messung sind noch experimentell.