section‹Avoidance of pattern matching on natural numbers›
theory Code_Abstract_Nat imports Main begin
text‹
When natural numbers are implemented in another than the
conventional inductive term‹0::nat›/term‹Suc› representation,
it is necessary to avoid all pattern matching on natural numbers
altogether. This is accomplished by this theory (up to a certain
extent). ›
subsection‹Case analysis›
text‹
Case analysis on natural numbers is rephrased using a conditional
expression: ›
lemma [code, code_unfold]: "case_nat = (λf g n. if n = 0 then f else g (n - 1))" by (auto simp add: fun_eq_iff dest!: gr0_implies_Suc)
subsection‹Preprocessors›
text‹
The term term‹Suc n› is no longer a valid pattern. Therefore,
all occurrences of this term in a position where a pattern is
expected (i.e.~on the left-hand side of a code equation) must be
eliminated. This can be accomplished -- as far as possible -- by
applying the following transformation rule: ›
lemma Suc_if_eq: assumes"∧n. f (Suc n) ≡ h n" assumes"f 0 ≡ g" shows"f n ≡ if n = 0 then g else h (n - 1)" by (rule eq_reflection) (cases n, insert assms, simp_all)
text‹
The rule above is built into a preprocessor that is plugged into
the code generator. ›
setup‹
Suc_if_eq = Thm.incr_indexes 1 @{thm Suc_if_eq};
remove_suc ctxt thms =
let
val vname = singleton (Name.variant_list (map fst
(fold (Term.add_var_names o Thm.full_prop_of) thms []))) "n";
val cv = Thm.cterm_of ctxt (Var ((vname, 0), HOLogic.natT));
val lhs_of = Thm.dest_arg1 o Thm.cprop_of;
val rhs_of = Thm.dest_arg o Thm.cprop_of;
fun find_vars ct = (case Thm.term_of ct of
(Const (🍋‹Suc›, _) $ Var _) => [(cv, snd (Thm.dest_comb ct))]
| _ $ _ =>
let val (ct1, ct2) = Thm.dest_comb ct
in
map (apfst (fn ct => Thm.apply ct ct2)) (find_vars ct1) @
map (apfst (Thm.apply ct1)) (find_vars ct2)
end
| _ => []);
val eqs = maps
(fn thm => map (pair thm) (find_vars (lhs_of thm))) thms;
fun mk_thms (thm, (ct, cv')) =
let
val thm' =
Thm.implies_elim
(Conv.fconv_rule (Thm.beta_conversion true)
(Thm.instantiate'
[SOME (Thm.ctyp_of_cterm ct)] [SOME (Thm.lambda cv ct),
SOME (Thm.lambda cv' (rhs_of thm)), NONE, SOME cv']
Suc_if_eq)) (Thm.forall_intr cv' thm)
in
case map_filter (fn thm'' =>
SOME (thm'', singleton
(Variable.trade (K (fn [thm'''] => [thm''' RS thm']))
(Variable.declare_thm thm'' ctxt)) thm'')
handle THM _ => NONE) thms of
[] => NONE
| thmps =>
let val (thms1, thms2) = split_list thmps
in SOME (subtract Thm.eq_thm (thm :: thms1) thms @ thms2) end
end
in get_first mk_thms eqs end;
eqn_suc_base_preproc ctxt thms =
let
val dest = fst o Logic.dest_equals o Thm.prop_of;
val contains_suc = exists_Const (fn (c, _) => c = 🍋‹Suc›);
in
if forall (can dest) thms andalso exists (contains_suc o dest) thms
then thms |> perhaps_loop (remove_suc ctxt) |> (Option.map o map) Drule.zero_var_indexes
else NONE
end;
subsection‹Candidates which need special treatment›
lemma drop_bit_int_code [code]: ‹drop_bit n k = k div 2 ^ n›for k :: int by (fact drop_bit_eq_div)
lemma take_bit_num_code [code]: ‹take_bit_num n Num.One =
(case n of 0 ==> None | Suc n ==> Some Num.One)› ‹take_bit_num n (Num.Bit0 m) =
(case n of 0 ==> None | Suc n ==> (case take_bit_num n m of None ==> None | Some q ==> Some (Num.Bit0 q)))› ‹take_bit_num n (Num.Bit1 m) =
(case n of 0 ==> None | Suc n ==> Some (case take_bit_num n m of None ==> Num.One | Some q ==> Num.Bit1 q))› by (cases n; simp)+
end
Messung V0.5 in Prozent
¤ Dauer der Verarbeitung: 0.10 Sekunden
(vorverarbeitet am 2026-06-10)
¤
Die Informationen auf dieser Webseite wurden
nach bestem Wissen sorgfältig zusammengestellt. Es wird jedoch weder Vollständigkeit, noch Richtigkeit,
noch Qualität der bereit gestellten Informationen zugesichert.
Bemerkung:
Die farbliche Syntaxdarstellung und die Messung sind noch experimentell.