(************************************************************************) (* * The Rocq Prover / The Rocq Development Team *) (* v * Copyright INRIA, CNRS and contributors *) (* <O___,, * (see version control and CREDITS file for authors & dates) *) (* \VV/ **************************************************************) (* // * This file is distributed under the terms of the *) (* * GNU Lesser General Public License Version 2.1 *) (* * (see LICENSE file for the text of the license) *) (************************************************************************)
(************************************************************************) (* EqDecide *) (* A tactic for deciding propositional equality on inductive types *) (* by Eduardo Gimenez *) (************************************************************************)
open Util open Names open Namegen open Constr open Context open EConstr open Declarations open Tactics open Tacticals open Auto open Constr_matching open Hipattern open Proofview.Notations open Tacmach open Tactypes
(* This file contains the implementation of the tactics ``Decide Equality'' and ``Compare''. They can be used to decide the propositional equality of two objects that belongs to a small inductive datatype --i.e., an inductive set such that all the arguments of its constructors are non-functional sets.
The procedure for proving (x,y:R){x=y}+{~x=y} can be scketched as follows: 1. Eliminate x and then y. 2. Try discrimination to solve those goals where x and y has been introduced by different constructors. 3. If x and y have been introduced by the same constructor, then analyse one by one the corresponding pairs of arguments. If they are equal, rewrite one into the other. If they are not, derive a contradiction from the injectiveness of the constructor. 4. Once all the arguments have been rewritten, solve the remaining half of the disjunction by reflexivity.
Eduardo Gimenez (30/3/98).
*)
let clear_last =
Proofview.tclEVARMAP >>= fun sigma ->
(onLastHyp (fun c -> (clear [destVar sigma c])))
let choose_eq eqonleft = if eqonleft then
left_with_bindings false NoBindings else
right_with_bindings false NoBindings let choose_noteq eqonleft = if eqonleft then
right_with_bindings false NoBindings else
left_with_bindings false NoBindings
(* A surgical generalize which selects the right occurrences by hand *) (* This prevents issues where c2 is also a subterm of c1 (see e.g. #5449) *)
type dectype = {
eqonleft : bool;
op : EConstr.t;
eq1 : EConstr.t;
eq2 : EConstr.t;
noteq : EConstr.t;
}
let mk_dectype { eqonleft; op; eq1; eq2; noteq } t x y = let eq = mkApp (eq1,[|t;x;y|]) in let neq = mkApp (noteq,[|mkApp (eq2,[|t;x;y|])|]) in if eqonleft then mkApp (op,[|eq;neq|]) else mkApp (op,[|neq;eq|])
let generalize_right dty typ c1 c2 =
Proofview.Goal.enter beginfun gl -> let env = Proofview.Goal.env gl in
Refine.refine_with_principal ~typecheck:falsebeginfun sigma -> let na = Name (next_name_away_with_default "x" Anonymous (Termops.vars_of_env env)) in let r = Retyping.relevance_of_type env sigma typ in let newconcl = mkProd (make_annot na r, typ, mk_dectype dty typ c1 (mkRel 1)) in let (sigma, x) = Evarutil.new_evar env sigma newconcl in
(sigma, mkApp (x, [|c2|]), Some (fst @@ destEvar sigma x)) end end
let mkBranches (dty, c1, c2, typ) =
tclTHENLIST
[generalize_right dty typ c1 c2;
Simple.elim c1;
intros;
onLastHyp Simple.case;
clear_last;
intros]
let inj_flags = Some {
Equality.keep_proof_equalities = true; (* necessary *)
Equality.injection_pattern_l2r_order = true; (* does not matter here *)
}
let discrHyp id = let c env sigma = (sigma, (mkVar id, NoBindings)) in let tac c = Equality.discr_tac false (Some (None, ElimOnConstr c)) in
Tacticals.tclDELAYEDWITHHOLES false c tac
let solveNoteqBranch side =
tclTHEN (choose_noteq side)
(tclTHEN introf
(onLastHypId (fun id -> discrHyp id)))
(* Constructs the type {c1=c2}+{~c1=c2} *)
let mkDecideEqGoal eqonleft (op,eq,neg) rectype c1 c2 = let equality = mkApp(eq, [|rectype; c1; c2|]) in let disequality = mkApp(neg, [|equality|]) in if eqonleft then mkApp(op, [|equality; disequality |]) else mkApp(op, [|disequality; equality |])
(* Constructs the type (x1,x2:R){x1=x2}+{~x1=x2} *)
let idx = Id.of_string "x" let idy = Id.of_string "y"
let mkGenDecideEqGoal rectype ops g = let sigma = Proofview.Goal.sigma g in let hypnames = pf_ids_set_of_hyps g in let xname = next_ident_away idx hypnames in let yname = next_ident_away idy (Id.Set.add xname hypnames) in
(mkNamedProd sigma (make_annot xname ERelevance.relevant) rectype
(mkNamedProd sigma (make_annot yname ERelevance.relevant) rectype
(mkDecideEqGoal true ops
rectype (mkVar xname) (mkVar yname))))
let rec rewrite_and_clear hyps = match hyps with
| [] -> Proofview.tclUNIT ()
| id :: hyps ->
tclTHENLIST [
Equality.rewriteLR (mkVar id);
clear [id];
rewrite_and_clear hyps;
]
let eqCase tac =
tclTHEN intro (onLastHypId tac)
let injHyp id = let c env sigma = (sigma, (mkVar id, NoBindings)) in let tac c = Equality.injClause inj_flags None false (Some (None, ElimOnConstr c)) in
Tacticals.tclDELAYEDWITHHOLES false c tac
(* spiwack: a PatternMatchingFailure wrapper around [Hipattern]. *)
let match_eqdec env sigma c = try let (eqonleft,_,c1,c2,ty) = match_eqdec env sigma c in let (op,eq1,noteq,eq2) = match EConstr.kind sigma c with
| App (op,[|ty1;ty2|]) -> let ty1, ty2 = if eqonleft then ty1, ty2 else ty2, ty1 in
(match EConstr.kind sigma ty1, EConstr.kind sigma ty2 with
| App (eq1,_), App (noteq,[|neq|]) ->
(match EConstr.kind sigma neq with
| App (eq2,_) -> op,eq1,noteq,eq2
| _ -> assert false)
| _ -> assert false)
| _ -> assert falsein let dty = { eqonleft; op; eq1; eq2; noteq } in
Proofview.tclUNIT (dty, c1, c2, ty) with PatternMatchingFailure as exn -> let _, info = Exninfo.capture exn in
Proofview.tclZERO ~info PatternMatchingFailure
(* /spiwack *)
let elim_type dty rectype a1 a2 =
Proofview.Goal.enter beginfun gl -> let env = Proofview.Goal.env gl in let sigma = Proofview.Goal.sigma gl in let (ind, _) = Tacred.reduce_to_atomic_ind env sigma dty.op in let s = Tacticals.elimination_sort_of_goal gl in let elimc = Indrec.lookup_eliminator env (fst ind) s in (* Eliminator type is expected to have (potentially non-dependent) shape
[forall A B (P : I A B -> Type), P _ -> P _ -> forall (s : I A B), P s ] *) let sigma, elimc = EConstr.fresh_global env sigma elimc in let elimc = let { eqonleft; eq1; eq2; noteq } = dty in let eq = mkApp (eq1,[|rectype;a1;a2|]) in let neq = mkApp (noteq,[|mkApp (eq2,[|rectype;a1;a2|])|]) in if eqonleft then mkApp (elimc, [|eq; neq|]) else mkApp (elimc, [|neq; eq|]) in let elimt = Retyping.get_type_of env sigma elimc in let clause = Clenv.mk_clenv_from env sigma (elimc, elimt) in
Proofview.Unsafe.tclEVARS sigma <*> Clenv.res_pf clause ~with_evars:false end
let rec solveArg hyps dty largs rargs = match largs, rargs with
| [], [] ->
tclTHENLIST [
choose_eq dty.eqonleft;
rewrite_and_clear (List.rev hyps);
intros_reflexivity;
]
| a1 :: largs, a2 :: rargs ->
Proofview.Goal.enter beginfun gl -> let sigma, rectype = pf_type_of gl a1 in let tac hyp = solveArg (hyp :: hyps) dty largs rargs in let subtacs = if dty.eqonleft then [eqCase tac;diseqCase hyps dty.eqonleft;default_auto] else [diseqCase hyps dty.eqonleft;eqCase tac;default_auto] in
tclTHEN (Proofview.Unsafe.tclEVARS sigma) (tclTHENS (elim_type dty rectype a1 a2) subtacs) end
| _ -> invalid_arg "List.fold_right2"
let solveEqBranch rectype =
Proofview.tclORELSE begin
Proofview.Goal.enter beginfun gl -> let concl = pf_concl gl in let env = Proofview.Goal.env gl in let sigma = project gl in
match_eqdec env sigma concl >>= fun (dty, lhs, rhs,_) -> let (mib,mip) = Inductive.lookup_mind_specif env rectype in let nparams = mib.mind_nparams in let getargs l = List.skipn nparams (snd (decompose_app_list sigma l)) in let rargs = getargs rhs and largs = getargs lhs in
solveArg [] dty largs rargs end end begin function (e, info) -> match e with
| PatternMatchingFailure -> Tacticals.tclZEROMSG (Pp.str"Unexpected conclusion!")
| e -> Proofview.tclZERO ~info e end
(* The tactic Decide Equality *)
let hd_app sigma c = match EConstr.kind sigma c with
| App (h,_) -> h
| _ -> c
let decideGralEquality =
Proofview.tclORELSE begin
Proofview.Goal.enter beginfun gl -> let concl = pf_concl gl in let env = Proofview.Goal.env gl in let sigma = project gl in
match_eqdec env sigma concl >>= fun (dty, c1, c2, typ as data) -> let headtyp = hd_app sigma (pf_whd_compute gl typ) in beginmatch EConstr.kind sigma headtyp with
| Ind (mi,_) -> Proofview.tclUNIT mi
| _ -> tclZEROMSG (Pp.str"This decision procedure only works for inductive objects.") end >>= fun rectype ->
(tclTHEN
(mkBranches data)
(tclORELSE (solveNoteqBranch dty.eqonleft) (solveEqBranch rectype))) end end begin function (e, info) -> match e with
| PatternMatchingFailure ->
Tacticals.tclZEROMSG (Pp.str"The goal must be of the form {x<>y}+{x=y} or {x=y}+{x<>y}.")
| e -> Proofview.tclZERO ~info e end
let decideEqualityGoal = tclTHEN intros decideGralEquality
let decideEquality rectype ops =
Proofview.Goal.enter beginfun gl -> let decide = mkGenDecideEqGoal rectype ops gl in
(tclTHENS (cut decide) [default_auto;decideEqualityGoal]) end
(* The tactic Compare *)
let compare c1 c2 = letopen Rocqlib in
pf_constr_of_global (lib_ref "core.sumbool.type") >>= fun opc ->
pf_constr_of_global (lib_ref "core.eq.type") >>= fun eqc ->
pf_constr_of_global (lib_ref "core.not.type") >>= fun notc ->
Proofview.Goal.enter beginfun gl -> let sigma, rectype = pf_type_of gl c1 in let ops = (opc,eqc,notc) in let decide = mkDecideEqGoal true ops rectype c1 c2 in
tclTHEN (Proofview.Unsafe.tclEVARS sigma)
(tclTHENS (cut decide)
[(tclTHEN intro
(tclTHEN (onLastHyp simplest_case) clear_last));
decideEquality rectype ops]) end
¤ Dauer der Verarbeitung: 0.18 Sekunden
(vorverarbeitet)
¤
Die Informationen auf dieser Webseite wurden
nach bestem Wissen sorgfältig zusammengestellt. Es wird jedoch weder Vollständigkeit, noch Richtigkeit,
noch Qualität der bereit gestellten Informationen zugesichert.
Bemerkung:
Die farbliche Syntaxdarstellung ist noch experimentell.