Quelle comparison1.pvs Sprache: PVS

comparison1
  [b,p:above(1),
   E_max:integer,
   E_min:{i:integer|E_max>i}]: THEORY

  BEGIN

  IMPORTING IEEE_854_values[b,p,E_max,E_min]

  num,num1,num2: var {fp:fp_num| finite?(fp) or infinite?(fp)}

% extend value function so that infinities can be compared to finite
% numbers
  n_value(num): real =
    IF infinite?(num) THEN (-1) ^ i_sign(num) * b ^ (E_max + 1)
    ELSE value(num)
    ENDIF


% From section 5.7 of IEEE-854:
%   ``Four mutually exclusive relations are possible: "less than,"
%  "equal," "greater than," and "unordered."  The last case arises only
%  when at least one operand is a NaN.'' ...

%  ``The result of a comparison shall be delivered in one of two ways at
%  the implementor's option: either as a condition code identifying one
%  of the four relations listed above, or as a true/false response to a
%  predicate that names the specific comparison desired.''

% fp_compare, below, defines the first option:

  comparison_code: type = {gt, lt, eq, un}

  fp_compare((fp1, fp2: fp_num)): comparison_code =
    IF NaN?(fp1) OR NaN?(fp2) THEN un
    ELSIF n_value(fp1) > n_value(fp2) THEN gt
    ELSIF n_value(fp1) < n_value(fp2) THEN lt
    ELSE eq
    ENDIF

  fp,fp1,fp2: var fp_num

  posinf_ge: LEMMA
        gt?(fp_compare(infinite(pos), num))
          OR eq?(fp_compare(infinite(pos), num))

  NaN_unordered: LEMMA
      NaN?(fp1) OR NaN?(fp2) => un?(fp_compare(fp1, fp2))

% option 2, minimal set of predicates is {eq, ne, gt, ge, lt, le} also
% should include un.  These predicates are defined below the level
% where invalid will be signalled.

% The follwing predicates are from table 3, page 12 of IEEE-854.  They
% do not include the signalling of the invalid exception.  That test
% may be applied prior to invoking these predicates.

% shall include
  eq?(fp1,fp2) :bool = eq?(fp_compare(fp1,fp2))
  ne?(fp1,fp2) :bool = not eq?(fp_compare(fp1,fp2))
  gt?(fp1,fp2) :bool = gt?(fp_compare(fp1,fp2))
  ge?(fp1,fp2) :bool = gt?(fp_compare(fp1,fp2)) or eq?(fp_compare(fp1,fp2))
  lt?(fp1,fp2) :bool = lt?(fp_compare(fp1,fp2))
  le?(fp1,fp2) :bool = lt?(fp_compare(fp1,fp2)) or eq?(fp_compare(fp1,fp2))

% should include
  un?(fp1,fp2) :bool = un?(fp_compare(fp1,fp2))

% other
  lg?(fp1,fp2) :bool = gt?(fp_compare(fp1,fp2)) or lt?(fp_compare(fp1,fp2))
  leg?(fp1,fp2):bool = not un?(fp_compare(fp1,fp2))
  ug?(fp1,fp2) :bool = gt?(fp_compare(fp1,fp2)) or un?(fp_compare(fp1,fp2))
  uge?(fp1,fp2):bool = not lt?(fp_compare(fp1,fp2))
  ul?(fp1,fp2) :bool = lt?(fp_compare(fp1,fp2)) or un?(fp_compare(fp1,fp2))
  ule?(fp1,fp2):bool = not gt?(fp_compare(fp1,fp2))
  ue?(fp1,fp2) :bool = eq?(fp_compare(fp1,fp2)) or un?(fp_compare(fp1,fp2))

  eq_def: lemma  eq?(num1,num2) <=> n_value(num1) = n_value(num2)

  ne_def: lemma  ne?(num1,num2) <=> n_value(num1) /= n_value(num2)

  gt_def: lemma  gt?(num1,num2) <=> n_value(num1) > n_value(num2)

  ge_def: lemma  ge?(num1,num2) <=> n_value(num1) >= n_value(num2)

  lt_def: lemma  lt?(num1,num2) <=> n_value(num1) < n_value(num2)

  le_def: lemma  le?(num1,num2) <=> n_value(num1) <= n_value(num2)

  un_def: lemma  un?(fp1,fp2)   <=> (NaN?(fp1) or NaN?(fp2))

  END comparison1

quality100%

¤ Dauer der Verarbeitung: 0.1 Sekunden (vorverarbeitet) ¤

Wurzel

Suchen

Beweissystem der NASA

Beweissystem Isabelle

NIST Cobol Testsuite

Cephes Mathematical Library

Wiener Entwicklungsmethode

Haftungshinweis

Die Informationen auf dieser Webseite wurden nach bestem Wissen sorgfältig zusammengestellt. Es wird jedoch weder Vollständigkeit, noch Richtigkeit, noch Qualität der bereit gestellten Informationen zugesichert.

Bemerkung:

Die farbliche Syntaxdarstellung ist noch experimentell.