(* Title: ZF/Resid/Substitution.thy
Author: Ole Rasmussen, University of Cambridge
*)
theory Substitution
imports Redex
begin
(** The clumsy _aux functions are required because other arguments vary
in the recursive calls ***)
consts
lift_aux ::
"i==> i"
primrec
"lift_aux(Var(i)) = (λk ∈ nat. if i
"lift_aux(Fun(t)) = (λk ∈ nat. Fun(lift_aux(t) ` succ(k)))"
"lift_aux(App(b,f,a)) = (λk ∈ nat. App(b, lift_aux(f)`k, lift_aux(a)`k))"
definition
lift_rec :: "[i,i]==> i" where
"lift_rec(r,k) ≡ lift_aux(r)`k"
abbreviation
lift :: "i==> i" where
"lift(r) ≡ lift_rec(r,0)"
consts
subst_aux :: "i==> i"
primrec
"subst_aux(Var(i)) =
(λr ∈ redexes. λk ∈ nat. if k
else if k=i then r else Var(i))"
"subst_aux(Fun(t)) =
(λr ∈ redexes. λk ∈ nat. Fun(subst_aux(t) ` lift(r) ` succ(k)))"
"subst_aux(App(b,f,a)) =
(λr ∈ redexes. λk ∈ nat. App(b, subst_aux(f)`r`k, subst_aux(a)`r`k))"
definition
subst_rec ::
"[i,i,i]==> i" (**NOTE THE ARGUMENT ORDER BELOW**) where
"subst_rec(u,r,k) ≡ subst_aux(r)`u`k"
abbreviation
subst ::
"[i,i]==> i" (
infixl ‹ '/› 70)
where
"u/v ≡ subst_rec(u,v,0)"
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
(* Arithmetic extensions *)
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
lemma gt_not_eq:
"p < n ==> n≠ p"
by blast
lemma succ_pred [rule_format, simp]:
"j ∈ nat ==> i < j ⟶ succ(j #- 1) = j"
by (induct_tac
"j" , auto)
lemma lt_pred:
"[ succ(x)∈ nat
] ==> x < n #- 1 "
apply (rule succ_leE)
apply (simp add: succ_pred)
done
lemma gt_pred:
"[ n < succ(x); p∈ nat
] ==> n #- 1 < x "
apply (rule succ_leE)
apply (simp add: succ_pred)
done
declare not_lt_iff_le [simp] if_P [simp] if_not_P [simp]
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
(* lift_rec equality rules *)
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
lemma lift_rec_Var:
"n ∈ nat ==> lift_rec(Var(i),n) = (if i
by (simp add: lift_rec_def)
lemma lift_rec_le [simp]:
"[ i ∈ nat; k≤ i] ==> lift_rec(Var(i),k) = Var(succ(i))"
by (simp add: lift_rec_def le_in_nat)
lemma lift_rec_gt [simp]: "[ k ∈ nat; i] ==> lift_rec(Var(i),k) = Var(i)"
by (simp add: lift_rec_def)
lemma lift_rec_Fun [simp]:
"k ∈ nat ==> lift_rec(Fun(t),k) = Fun(lift_rec(t,succ(k)))"
by (simp add: lift_rec_def)
lemma lift_rec_App [simp]:
"k ∈ nat ==> lift_rec(App(b,f,a),k) = App(b,lift_rec(f,k),lift_rec(a,k))"
by (simp add: lift_rec_def)
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
(* substitution quality rules *)
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
lemma subst_Var:
"[ k ∈ nat; u ∈ redexes]
==> subst_rec(u,Var(i),k) =
(if k
by (simp add: subst_rec_def gt_not_eq leI)
lemma subst_eq [simp]:
"[ n ∈ nat; u ∈ redexes] ==> subst_rec(u,Var(n),n) = u"
by (simp add: subst_rec_def)
lemma subst_gt [simp]:
"[ u ∈ redexes; p ∈ nat; p] ==> subst_rec(u,Var(n),p) = Var(n #- 1)"
by (simp add: subst_rec_def)
lemma subst_lt [simp]:
"[ u ∈ redexes; p ∈ nat; n]
==> subst_rec(u,Var(n),p) = Var(n)"
by (simp add: subst_rec_def gt_not_eq leI lt_nat_in_nat)
lemma subst_Fun [simp]:
"[ p ∈ nat; u ∈ redexes]
==> subst_rec(u,Fun(t),p) = Fun(subst_rec(lift(u),t,succ(p))) "
by (simp add: subst_rec_def)
lemma subst_App [simp]:
"[ p ∈ nat; u ∈ redexes]
==> subst_rec(u,App(b,f,a),p) = App(b,subst_rec(u,f,p),subst_rec(u,a,p))"
by (simp add: subst_rec_def)
lemma lift_rec_type [rule_format, simp]:
"u ∈ redexes ==> ∀ k ∈ nat. lift_rec(u,k) ∈ redexes"
apply (erule redexes.induct)
apply (simp_all add: lift_rec_Var lift_rec_Fun lift_rec_App)
done
lemma subst_type [rule_format, simp]:
"v ∈ redexes ==> ∀ n ∈ nat. ∀ u ∈ redexes. subst_rec(u,v,n) ∈ redexes"
apply (erule redexes.induct)
apply (simp_all add: subst_Var lift_rec_type)
done
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
(* lift and substitution proofs *)
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
(*The i\<in>nat is redundant*)
lemma lift_lift_rec [rule_format]:
"u ∈ redexes
==> ∀ n ∈ nat. ∀ i ∈ nat. i≤ n ⟶
(lift_rec(lift_rec(u,i),succ(n)) = lift_rec(lift_rec(u,n),i))"
apply (erule redexes.induct, auto)
apply (case_tac
"n < i" )
apply (frule lt_trans2, assumption)
apply (simp_all add: lift_rec_Var leI)
done
lemma lift_lift:
"[ u ∈ redexes; n ∈ nat]
==> lift_rec(lift(u),succ(n)) = lift(lift_rec(u,n))"
by (simp add: lift_lift_rec)
lemma lt_not_m1_lt:
"[ m < n; n ∈ nat; m ∈ nat] ==> ¬ n #- 1 < m"
by (erule natE, auto)
lemma lift_rec_subst_rec [rule_format]:
"v ∈ redexes ==>
∀ n ∈ nat. ∀ m ∈ nat. ∀ u ∈ redexes. n≤ m⟶
lift_rec(subst_rec(u,v,n),m) =
subst_rec(lift_rec(u,m),lift_rec(v,succ(m)),n)"
apply (erule redexes.induct, simp_all (no_asm_simp) add: lift_lift)
apply safe
apply (rename_tac n n' m u)
apply (case_tac
"n < n'" )
apply (frule_tac j = n'
in lt_trans2, assumption)
apply (simp add: leI, simp)
apply (erule_tac j=n
in leE)
apply (auto simp add: lift_rec_Var subst_Var leI lt_not_m1_lt)
done
lemma lift_subst:
"[ v ∈ redexes; u ∈ redexes; n ∈ nat]
==> lift_rec(u/v,n) = lift_rec(u,n)/lift_rec(v,succ(n))"
by (simp add: lift_rec_subst_rec)
lemma lift_rec_subst_rec_lt [rule_format]:
"v ∈ redexes ==>
∀ n ∈ nat. ∀ m ∈ nat. ∀ u ∈ redexes. m≤ n⟶
lift_rec(subst_rec(u,v,n),m) =
subst_rec(lift_rec(u,m),lift_rec(v,m),succ(n))"
apply (erule redexes.induct, simp_all (no_asm_simp) add: lift_lift)
apply safe
apply (rename_tac n n' m u)
apply (case_tac
"n < n'" )
apply (case_tac
"n < m" )
apply (simp_all add: leI)
apply (erule_tac i=n'
in leE)
apply (frule lt_trans1, assumption)
apply (simp_all add: succ_pred leI gt_pred)
done
lemma subst_rec_lift_rec [rule_format]:
"u ∈ redexes ==>
∀ n ∈ nat. ∀ v ∈ redexes. subst_rec(v,lift_rec(u,n),n) = u"
apply (erule redexes.induct, auto)
apply (case_tac
"n < na" , auto)
done
lemma subst_rec_subst_rec [rule_format]:
"v ∈ redexes ==>
∀ m ∈ nat. ∀ n ∈ nat. ∀ u ∈ redexes. ∀ w ∈ redexes. m≤ n ⟶
subst_rec(subst_rec(w,u,n),subst_rec(lift_rec(w,m),v,succ(n)),m) =
subst_rec(w,subst_rec(u,v,m),n)"
apply (erule redexes.induct)
apply (simp_all add: lift_lift [symmetric] lift_rec_subst_rec_lt, safe)
apply (rename_tac n' u w)
apply (case_tac
"n ≤ succ(n') " )
apply (erule_tac i = n
in leE)
apply (simp_all add: succ_pred subst_rec_lift_rec leI)
apply (case_tac
"n < m" )
apply (frule lt_trans2, assumption, simp add: gt_pred)
apply simp
apply (erule_tac j = n
in leE, simp add: gt_pred)
apply (simp add: subst_rec_lift_rec)
(*final case*)
apply (frule nat_into_Ord [
THEN le_refl,
THEN lt_trans], assumption)
apply (erule leE)
apply (frule succ_leI [
THEN lt_trans], assumption)
apply (frule_tac i = m
in nat_into_Ord [
THEN le_refl,
THEN lt_trans],
assumption)
apply (simp_all add: succ_pred lt_pred)
done
lemma substitution:
"[ v ∈ redexes; u ∈ redexes; w ∈ redexes; n ∈ nat]
==> subst_rec(w,u,n)/subst_rec(lift(w),v,succ(n)) = subst_rec(w,u/v,n)"
by (simp add: subst_rec_subst_rec)
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
(* Preservation lemmas *)
(* Substitution preserves comp and regular *)
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
lemma lift_rec_preserve_comp [rule_format, simp]:
"u ∼ v ==> ∀ m ∈ nat. lift_rec(u,m) ∼ lift_rec(v,m)"
by (erule Scomp.induct, simp_all add: comp_refl)
lemma subst_rec_preserve_comp [rule_format, simp]:
"u2 ∼ v2 ==> ∀ m ∈ nat. ∀ u1 ∈ redexes. ∀ v1 ∈ redexes.
u1 ∼ v1⟶ subst_rec(u1,u2,m) ∼ subst_rec(v1,v2,m)"
by (erule Scomp.induct,
simp_all add: subst_Var lift_rec_preserve_comp comp_refl)
lemma lift_rec_preserve_reg [simp]:
"regular(u) ==> ∀ m ∈ nat. regular(lift_rec(u,m))"
by (erule Sreg.induct, simp_all add: lift_rec_Var)
lemma subst_rec_preserve_reg [simp]:
"regular(v) ==>
∀ m ∈ nat. ∀ u ∈ redexes. regular(u)⟶ regular(subst_rec(u,v,m))"
by (erule Sreg.induct, simp_all add: subst_Var lift_rec_preserve_reg)
end
Messung V0.5 in Prozent C=92 H=100 G=95
¤ Dauer der Verarbeitung: 0.13 Sekunden
(vorverarbeitet am 2026-04-28)
¤
*© Formatika GbR, Deutschland