Quelle  Rank_Separation.thy

(*  Title:      ZF/Constructible/Rank_Separation.thy
  Author: Lawrence C Paulson, Cambridge University Computer Laboratory
*)

section ‹Separation for Facts About Order Types, Rank Functions and
  Well-Founded Relations›

theory Rank_Separation imports Rank Rec_Separation begin


text‹This theory proves all instances needed for locales
  ‹M_ordertype› and ‹M_wfrank›. But the material is not
  needed for proving the relative consistency of AC.›

subsection‹The Locale ‹M_ordertype›\›

subsubsection‹Separation for Order-Isomorphisms›

lemma well_ord_iso_Reflects:
  "REFLECTS[λx. x∈A ⟶
                (∃y[L]. ∃p[L]. fun_apply(L,f,x,y) ∧ pair(L,y,x,p) ∧ p ∈ r),
        λi x. x∈A ⟶ (∃y ∈ Lset(i). ∃p ∈ Lset(i).
                fun_apply(##Lset(i),f,x,y) ∧ pair(##Lset(i),y,x,p) ∧ p ∈ r)]"
by (intro FOL_reflections function_reflections)

lemma well_ord_iso_separation:
     "[L(A); L(f); L(r)]
      ==> separation (L, λx. x∈A ⟶ (∃y[L]. (∃p[L].
                     fun_apply(L,f,x,y) ∧ pair(L,y,x,p) ∧ p ∈ r)))"
apply (rule gen_separation_multi [OF well_ord_iso_Reflects, of "{A,f,r}"], 
       auto)
apply (rule_tac env="[A,f,r]" in DPow_LsetI)
apply (rule sep_rules | simp)+
done


subsubsection‹Separation for 🍋‹obase›\›

lemma obase_reflects:
  "REFLECTS[λa. ∃x[L]. ∃g[L]. ∃mx[L]. ∃par[L].
             ordinal(L,x) ∧ membership(L,x,mx) ∧ pred_set(L,A,a,r,par) ∧
             order_isomorphism(L,par,r,x,mx,g),
        λi a. ∃x ∈ Lset(i). ∃g ∈ Lset(i). ∃mx ∈ Lset(i). ∃par ∈ Lset(i).
             ordinal(##Lset(i),x) ∧ membership(##Lset(i),x,mx) ∧ pred_set(##Lset(i),A,a,r,par) ∧
             order_isomorphism(##Lset(i),par,r,x,mx,g)]"
by (intro FOL_reflections function_reflections fun_plus_reflections)

lemma obase_separation:
     🍋 ‹part of the order type formalization›
     "[L(A); L(r)]
      ==> separation(L, λa. ∃x[L]. ∃g[L]. ∃mx[L]. ∃par[L].
             ordinal(L,x) ∧ membership(L,x,mx) ∧ pred_set(L,A,a,r,par) ∧
             order_isomorphism(L,par,r,x,mx,g))"
apply (rule gen_separation_multi [OF obase_reflects, of "{A,r}"], auto)
apply (rule_tac env="[A,r]" in DPow_LsetI)
apply (rule ordinal_iff_sats sep_rules | simp)+
done


subsubsection‹Separation for a Theorem about 🍋‹obase›\›

lemma obase_equals_reflects:
  "REFLECTS[λx. x∈A ⟶ ¬(∃y[L]. ∃g[L].
                ordinal(L,y) ∧ (∃my[L]. ∃pxr[L].
                membership(L,y,my) ∧ pred_set(L,A,x,r,pxr) ∧
                order_isomorphism(L,pxr,r,y,my,g))),
        λi x. x∈A ⟶ ¬(∃y ∈ Lset(i). ∃g ∈ Lset(i).
                ordinal(##Lset(i),y) ∧ (∃my ∈ Lset(i). ∃pxr ∈ Lset(i).
                membership(##Lset(i),y,my) ∧ pred_set(##Lset(i),A,x,r,pxr) ∧
                order_isomorphism(##Lset(i),pxr,r,y,my,g)))]"
by (intro FOL_reflections function_reflections fun_plus_reflections)

lemma obase_equals_separation:
     "[L(A); L(r)]
      ==> separation (L, λx. x∈A ⟶ ¬(∃y[L]. ∃g[L].
                              ordinal(L,y) ∧ (∃my[L]. ∃pxr[L].
                              membership(L,y,my) ∧ pred_set(L,A,x,r,pxr) ∧
                              order_isomorphism(L,pxr,r,y,my,g))))"
apply (rule gen_separation_multi [OF obase_equals_reflects, of "{A,r}"], auto)
apply (rule_tac env="[A,r]" in DPow_LsetI)
apply (rule sep_rules | simp)+
done


subsubsection‹Replacement for 🍋‹omap›\›

lemma omap_reflects:
 "REFLECTS[λz. ∃a[L]. a∈B ∧ (∃x[L]. ∃g[L]. ∃mx[L]. ∃par[L].
     ordinal(L,x) ∧ pair(L,a,x,z) ∧ membership(L,x,mx) ∧
     pred_set(L,A,a,r,par) ∧ order_isomorphism(L,par,r,x,mx,g)),
 λi z. ∃a ∈ Lset(i). a∈B ∧ (∃x ∈ Lset(i). ∃g ∈ Lset(i). ∃mx ∈ Lset(i).
        ∃par ∈ Lset(i).
         ordinal(##Lset(i),x) ∧ pair(##Lset(i),a,x,z) ∧
         membership(##Lset(i),x,mx) ∧ pred_set(##Lset(i),A,a,r,par) ∧
         order_isomorphism(##Lset(i),par,r,x,mx,g))]"
by (intro FOL_reflections function_reflections fun_plus_reflections)

lemma omap_replacement:
     "[L(A); L(r)]
      ==> strong_replacement(L,
             λa z. ∃x[L]. ∃g[L]. ∃mx[L]. ∃par[L].
             ordinal(L,x) ∧ pair(L,a,x,z) ∧ membership(L,x,mx) ∧
             pred_set(L,A,a,r,par) ∧ order_isomorphism(L,par,r,x,mx,g))"
apply (rule strong_replacementI)
apply (rule_tac u="{A,r,B}" in gen_separation_multi [OF omap_reflects], auto)
apply (rule_tac env="[A,B,r]" in DPow_LsetI)
apply (rule sep_rules | simp)+
done



subsection‹Instantiating the locale ‹M_ordertype›\›
text‹Separation (and Strong Replacement) for basic set-theoretic constructions
 such as intersection, Cartesian Product and image.›

lemma M_ordertype_axioms_L: "M_ordertype_axioms(L)"
  apply (rule M_ordertype_axioms.intro)
       apply (assumption | rule well_ord_iso_separation
         obase_separation obase_equals_separation
         omap_replacement)+
  done

theorem M_ordertype_L: "M_ordertype(L)"
  apply (rule M_ordertype.intro)
   apply (rule M_basic_L)
  apply (rule M_ordertype_axioms_L) 
  done


subsection‹The Locale ‹M_wfrank›\›

subsubsection‹Separation for 🍋‹wfrank›\›

lemma wfrank_Reflects:
 "REFLECTS[λx. ∀rplus[L]. tran_closure(L,r,rplus) ⟶
              ¬ (∃f[L]. M_is_recfun(L, λx f y. is_range(L,f,y), rplus, x, f)),
      λi x. ∀rplus ∈ Lset(i). tran_closure(##Lset(i),r,rplus) ⟶
         ¬ (∃f ∈ Lset(i).
            M_is_recfun(##Lset(i), λx f y. is_range(##Lset(i),f,y),
                        rplus, x, f))]"
by (intro FOL_reflections function_reflections is_recfun_reflection tran_closure_reflection)

lemma wfrank_separation:
     "L(r) ==>
      separation (L, λx. ∀rplus[L]. tran_closure(L,r,rplus) ⟶
         ¬ (∃f[L]. M_is_recfun(L, λx f y. is_range(L,f,y), rplus, x, f)))"
apply (rule gen_separation [OF wfrank_Reflects], simp)
apply (rule_tac env="[r]" in DPow_LsetI)
apply (rule sep_rules tran_closure_iff_sats is_recfun_iff_sats | simp)+
done


subsubsection‹Replacement for 🍋‹wfrank›\›

lemma wfrank_replacement_Reflects:
 "REFLECTS[λz. ∃x[L]. x ∈ A ∧
        (∀rplus[L]. tran_closure(L,r,rplus) ⟶
         (∃y[L]. ∃f[L]. pair(L,x,y,z) ∧
                        M_is_recfun(L, λx f y. is_range(L,f,y), rplus, x, f) ∧
                        is_range(L,f,y))),
 λi z. ∃x ∈ Lset(i). x ∈ A ∧
      (∀rplus ∈ Lset(i). tran_closure(##Lset(i),r,rplus) ⟶
       (∃y ∈ Lset(i). ∃f ∈ Lset(i). pair(##Lset(i),x,y,z) ∧
         M_is_recfun(##Lset(i), λx f y. is_range(##Lset(i),f,y), rplus, x, f) ∧
         is_range(##Lset(i),f,y)))]"
by (intro FOL_reflections function_reflections fun_plus_reflections
             is_recfun_reflection tran_closure_reflection)

lemma wfrank_strong_replacement:
     "L(r) ==>
      strong_replacement(L, λx z.
         ∀rplus[L]. tran_closure(L,r,rplus) ⟶
         (∃y[L]. ∃f[L]. pair(L,x,y,z) ∧
                        M_is_recfun(L, λx f y. is_range(L,f,y), rplus, x, f) ∧
                        is_range(L,f,y)))"
apply (rule strong_replacementI)
apply (rule_tac u="{r,B}" 
         in gen_separation_multi [OF wfrank_replacement_Reflects], 
       auto)
apply (rule_tac env="[r,B]" in DPow_LsetI)
apply (rule sep_rules tran_closure_iff_sats is_recfun_iff_sats | simp)+
done


subsubsection‹Separation for Proving ‹Ord_wfrank_range›\›

lemma Ord_wfrank_Reflects:
 "REFLECTS[λx. ∀rplus[L]. tran_closure(L,r,rplus) ⟶
          ¬ (∀f[L]. ∀rangef[L].
             is_range(L,f,rangef) ⟶
             M_is_recfun(L, λx f y. is_range(L,f,y), rplus, x, f) ⟶
             ordinal(L,rangef)),
      λi x. ∀rplus ∈ Lset(i). tran_closure(##Lset(i),r,rplus) ⟶
          ¬ (∀f ∈ Lset(i). ∀rangef ∈ Lset(i).
             is_range(##Lset(i),f,rangef) ⟶
             M_is_recfun(##Lset(i), λx f y. is_range(##Lset(i),f,y),
                         rplus, x, f) ⟶
             ordinal(##Lset(i),rangef))]"
by (intro FOL_reflections function_reflections is_recfun_reflection
          tran_closure_reflection ordinal_reflection)

lemma  Ord_wfrank_separation:
     "L(r) ==>
      separation (L, λx.
         ∀rplus[L]. tran_closure(L,r,rplus) ⟶
          ¬ (∀f[L]. ∀rangef[L].
             is_range(L,f,rangef) ⟶
             M_is_recfun(L, λx f y. is_range(L,f,y), rplus, x, f) ⟶
             ordinal(L,rangef)))"
apply (rule gen_separation [OF Ord_wfrank_Reflects], simp)
apply (rule_tac env="[r]" in DPow_LsetI)
apply (rule sep_rules tran_closure_iff_sats is_recfun_iff_sats | simp)+
done


subsubsection‹Instantiating the locale ‹M_wfrank›\›

lemma M_wfrank_axioms_L: "M_wfrank_axioms(L)"
  apply (rule M_wfrank_axioms.intro)
   apply (assumption | rule
     wfrank_separation wfrank_strong_replacement Ord_wfrank_separation)+
  done

theorem M_wfrank_L: "M_wfrank(L)"
  apply (rule M_wfrank.intro)
   apply (rule M_trancl_L)
  apply (rule M_wfrank_axioms_L) 
  done

lemmas exists_wfrank = M_wfrank.exists_wfrank [OF M_wfrank_L]
  and M_wellfoundedrank = M_wfrank.M_wellfoundedrank [OF M_wfrank_L]
  and Ord_wfrank_range = M_wfrank.Ord_wfrank_range [OF M_wfrank_L]
  and Ord_range_wellfoundedrank = M_wfrank.Ord_range_wellfoundedrank [OF M_wfrank_L]
  and function_wellfoundedrank = M_wfrank.function_wellfoundedrank [OF M_wfrank_L]
  and domain_wellfoundedrank = M_wfrank.domain_wellfoundedrank [OF M_wfrank_L]
  and wellfoundedrank_type = M_wfrank.wellfoundedrank_type [OF M_wfrank_L]
  and Ord_wellfoundedrank = M_wfrank.Ord_wellfoundedrank [OF M_wfrank_L]
  and wellfoundedrank_eq = M_wfrank.wellfoundedrank_eq [OF M_wfrank_L]
  and wellfoundedrank_lt = M_wfrank.wellfoundedrank_lt [OF M_wfrank_L]
  and wellfounded_imp_subset_rvimage = M_wfrank.wellfounded_imp_subset_rvimage [OF M_wfrank_L]
  and wellfounded_imp_wf = M_wfrank.wellfounded_imp_wf [OF M_wfrank_L]
  and wellfounded_on_imp_wf_on = M_wfrank.wellfounded_on_imp_wf_on [OF M_wfrank_L]
  and wf_abs = M_wfrank.wf_abs [OF M_wfrank_L]
  and wf_on_abs = M_wfrank.wf_on_abs [OF M_wfrank_L]

end