(* Title: HOL/Library/Mapping.thy Author: Florian Haftmann and Ondrej Kuncar *)
section‹An abstract view on maps for code generation.›
theory Mapping imports Main AList begin
subsection‹Parametricity transfer rules›
lemma map_of_foldr: "map_of xs = foldr (λ(k, v) m. m(k ↦ v)) xs Map.empty"(* FIXME move *) using map_add_map_of_foldr [of Map.empty] by auto
contextincludes lifting_syntax begin
lemma empty_parametric: "(A ===> rel_option B) Map.empty Map.empty" by transfer_prover
lemma lookup_parametric: "((A ===> B) ===> A ===> B) (λm k. m k) (λm k. m k)" by transfer_prover
lemma update_parametric: assumes [transfer_rule]: "bi_unique A" shows"(A ===> B ===> (A ===> rel_option B) ===> A ===> rel_option B) (λk v m. m(k ↦ v)) (λk v m. m(k ↦ v))" by transfer_prover
lemma delete_parametric: assumes [transfer_rule]: "bi_unique A" shows"(A ===> (A ===> rel_option B) ===> A ===> rel_option B) (λk m. m(k := None)) (λk m. m(k := None))" by transfer_prover
lemma is_none_parametric [transfer_rule]: "(rel_option A ===> HOL.eq) Option.is_none Option.is_none" by (auto simp add: Option.is_none_def rel_fun_def rel_option_iff split: option.split)
lemma dom_parametric: assumes [transfer_rule]: "bi_total A" shows"((A ===> rel_option B) ===> rel_set A) dom dom" unfolding dom_def [abs_def] Option.is_none_def [symmetric] by transfer_prover
lemma graph_parametric: assumes"bi_total A" shows"((A ===> rel_option B) ===> rel_set (rel_prod A B)) Map.graph Map.graph" proof fix f g assume"(A ===> rel_option B) f g" with assms[unfolded bi_total_def] show"rel_set (rel_prod A B) (Map.graph f) (Map.graph g)" unfolding graph_def rel_set_def rel_fun_def by auto (metis option_rel_Some1 option_rel_Some2)+ qed
lemma map_entry_parametric [transfer_rule]: assumes [transfer_rule]: "bi_unique A" shows"(A ===> (B ===> B) ===> (A ===> rel_option B) ===> A ===> rel_option B) (λk f m. (case m k of None ==> m | Some v ==> m (k ↦ (f v)))) (λk f m. (case m k of None ==> m | Some v ==> m (k ↦ (f v))))" by transfer_prover
lemma tabulate_parametric: assumes [transfer_rule]: "bi_unique A" shows"(list_all2 A ===> (A ===> B) ===> A ===> rel_option B) (λks f. (map_of (map (λk. (k, f k)) ks))) (λks f. (map_of (map (λk. (k, f k)) ks)))" by transfer_prover
lemma bulkload_parametric: "(list_all2 A ===> HOL.eq ===> rel_option A) (λxs k. if k < length xs then Some (xs ! k) else None) (λxs k. if k < length xs then Some (xs ! k) else None)" proof fix xs ys assume"list_all2 A xs ys" thenshow "(HOL.eq ===> rel_option A) (λk. if k < length xs then Some (xs ! k) else None) (λk. if k < length ys then Some (ys ! k) else None)" by induct (auto simp add: list_all2_lengthD list_all2_nthD rel_funI) qed
lemma map_parametric: "((A ===> B) ===> (C ===> D) ===> (B ===> rel_option C) ===> A ===> rel_option D) (λf g m. (map_option g ∘ m ∘ f)) (λf g m. (map_option g ∘ m ∘ f))" by transfer_prover
lemma combine_with_key_parametric: "((A ===> B ===> B ===> B) ===> (A ===> rel_option B) ===> (A ===> rel_option B) ===> (A ===> rel_option B)) (λf m1 m2 x. combine_options (f x) (m1 x) (m2 x)) (λf m1 m2 x. combine_options (f x) (m1 x) (m2 x))" unfolding combine_options_def by transfer_prover
lemma combine_parametric: "((B ===> B ===> B) ===> (A ===> rel_option B) ===> (A ===> rel_option B) ===> (A ===> rel_option B)) (λf m1 m2 x. combine_options f (m1 x) (m2 x)) (λf m1 m2 x. combine_options f (m1 x) (m2 x))" unfolding combine_options_def by transfer_prover
end
subsection‹Type definition and primitive operations›
lift_definition filter :: "('a ==> 'b ==> bool) ==> ('a, 'b) mapping ==> ('a, 'b) mapping" is"λP m k. case m k of None ==> None | Some v ==> if P k v then Some v else None".
lift_definition keys :: "('a, 'b) mapping ==> 'a set" is dom parametric dom_parametric .
definition"All_mapping m P ⟷ (∀x. case Mapping.lookup m x of None ==> True | Some y ==> P x y)"
declare [[code drop: map]]
subsection‹Functorial structure›
functor map: map by (transfer, auto simp add: fun_eq_iff option.map_comp option.map_id)+
subsection‹Derived operations›
definition ordered_keys :: "('a::linorder, 'b) mapping ==> 'a list" where"ordered_keys m = (if finite (keys m) then sorted_list_of_set (keys m) else [])"
definition ordered_entries :: "('a::linorder, 'b) mapping ==> ('a × 'b) list" where"ordered_entries m = (if finite (entries m) then sorted_key_list_of_set fst (entries m) else [])"
definition fold :: "('a::linorder ==> 'b ==> 'c ==> 'c) ==> ('a, 'b) mapping ==> 'c==> 'c" where"fold f m a = List.fold (case_prod f) (ordered_entries m) a"
definition is_empty :: "('a, 'b) mapping ==> bool" where"is_empty m ⟷ keys m = {}"
definition size :: "('a, 'b) mapping ==> nat" where"size m = (if finite (keys m) then card (keys m) else 0)"
definition replace :: "'a ==> 'b ==> ('a, 'b) mapping ==> ('a, 'b) mapping" where"replace k v m = (if k ∈ keys m then update k v m else m)"
definition default :: "'a ==> 'b ==> ('a, 'b) mapping ==> ('a, 'b) mapping" where"default k v m = (if k ∈ keys m then m else update k v m)"
text‹Manual derivation of transfer rule is non-trivial›
lift_definition map_entry :: "'a ==> ('b ==> 'b) ==> ('a, 'b) mapping ==> ('a, 'b) mapping"is "λk f m. (case m k of None ==> m | Some v ==> m (k ↦ (f v)))" parametric map_entry_parametric .
lemma map_entry_code [code]: "map_entry k f m = (case lookup m k of None ==> m | Some v ==> update k (f v) m)" by transfer rule
definition map_default :: "'a ==> 'b ==> ('b ==> 'b) ==> ('a, 'b) mapping ==> ('a, 'b) mapping" where"map_default k v f m = map_entry k f (default k v m)"
definition of_alist :: "('k × 'v) list ==> ('k, 'v) mapping" where"of_alist xs = foldr (λ(k, v) m. update k v m) xs empty"
instance proof show"∧x y::('a, 'b) mapping. equal_class.equal x y = (x = y)" unfolding equal_mapping_def by transfer auto qed
end
contextincludes lifting_syntax begin
lemma [transfer_rule]: assumes [transfer_rule]: "bi_total A" and [transfer_rule]: "bi_unique B" shows"(pcr_mapping A B ===> pcr_mapping A B ===> (=)) HOL.eq HOL.equal" unfolding equal by transfer_prover
lemma mapping_eqI: "(∧x. lookup m x = lookup m' x) ==> m = m'" by transfer (simp add: fun_eq_iff)
lemma mapping_eqI': assumes"∧x. x ∈ Mapping.keys m ==> Mapping.lookup_default d m x = Mapping.lookup_default d m' x" and"Mapping.keys m = Mapping.keys m'" shows"m = m'" proof (intro mapping_eqI) show"Mapping.lookup m x = Mapping.lookup m' x"for x proof (cases "Mapping.lookup m x") case None thenhave"x ∉ Mapping.keys m" by transfer (simp add: dom_def) thenhave"x ∉ Mapping.keys m'" by (simp add: assms) thenhave"Mapping.lookup m' x = None" by transfer (simp add: dom_def) with None show ?thesis by simp next case (Some y) thenhave A: "x ∈ Mapping.keys m" by transfer (simp add: dom_def) thenhave"x ∈ Mapping.keys m'" by (simp add: assms) thenhave"∃y'. Mapping.lookup m' x = Some y'" by transfer (simp add: dom_def) with Some assms(1)[OF A] show ?thesis by (auto simp add: lookup_default_def) qed qed
lemma lookup_update[simp]: "lookup (update k v m) k = Some v" by transfer simp
lemma lookup_update_neq[simp]: "k ≠ k' ==> lookup (update k v m) k' = lookup m k'" by transfer simp
lemma lookup_update': "lookup (update k v m) k' = (if k = k' then Some v else lookup m k')" by transfer simp
lemma lookup_empty[simp]: "lookup empty k = None" by transfer simp
lemma lookup_delete[simp]: "lookup (delete k m) k = None" by transfer simp
lemma lookup_delete_neq[simp]: "k ≠ k' ==> lookup (delete k m) k' = lookup m k'" by transfer simp
lemma lookup_filter: "lookup (filter P m) k = (case lookup m k of None ==> None | Some v ==> if P k v then Some v else None)" by transfer simp_all
lemma lookup_map_values: "lookup (map_values f m) k = map_option (f k) (lookup m k)" by transfer simp_all
lemma lookup_default_empty: "lookup_default d empty k = d" by (simp add: lookup_default_def lookup_empty)
lemma lookup_default_update: "lookup_default d (update k v m) k = v" by (simp add: lookup_default_def)
lemma lookup_default_update_neq: "k ≠ k' ==> lookup_default d (update k v m) k' = lookup_default d m k'" by (simp add: lookup_default_def)
lemma lookup_default_update': "lookup_default d (update k v m) k' = (if k = k' then v else lookup_default d m k')" by (auto simp: lookup_default_update lookup_default_update_neq)
lemma lookup_default_filter: "lookup_default d (filter P m) k = (if P k (lookup_default d m k) then lookup_default d m k else d)" by (simp add: lookup_default_def lookup_filter split: option.splits)
lemma lookup_default_map_values: "lookup_default (f k d) (map_values f m) k = f k (lookup_default d m k)" by (simp add: lookup_default_def lookup_map_values split: option.splits)
lemma lookup_combine_with_key: "Mapping.lookup (combine_with_key f m1 m2) x = combine_options (f x) (Mapping.lookup m1 x) (Mapping.lookup m2 x)" by transfer (auto split: option.splits)
lemma combine_altdef: "combine f m1 m2 = combine_with_key (λ_. f) m1 m2" by transfer' (rule refl)
lemma lookup_combine: "Mapping.lookup (combine f m1 m2) x = combine_options f (Mapping.lookup m1 x) (Mapping.lookup m2 x)" by transfer (auto split: option.splits)
lemma lookup_default_neutral_combine_with_key: assumes"∧x. f k d x = x""∧x. f k x d = x" shows"Mapping.lookup_default d (combine_with_key f m1 m2) k = f k (Mapping.lookup_default d m1 k) (Mapping.lookup_default d m2 k)" by (auto simp: lookup_default_def lookup_combine_with_key assms split: option.splits)
lemma lookup_default_neutral_combine: assumes"∧x. f d x = x""∧x. f x d = x" shows"Mapping.lookup_default d (combine f m1 m2) x = f (Mapping.lookup_default d m1 x) (Mapping.lookup_default d m2 x)" by (auto simp: lookup_default_def lookup_combine assms split: option.splits)
lemma lookup_map_entry: "lookup (map_entry x f m) x = map_option f (lookup m x)" by transfer (auto split: option.splits)
lemma lookup_map_entry_neq: "x ≠ y ==> lookup (map_entry x f m) y = lookup m y" by transfer (auto split: option.splits)
lemma lookup_map_entry': "lookup (map_entry x f m) y = (if x = y then map_option f (lookup m y) else lookup m y)" by transfer (auto split: option.splits)
lemma lookup_default: "lookup (default x d m) x = Some (lookup_default d m x)" unfolding lookup_default_def default_def by transfer (auto split: option.splits)
lemma lookup_default_neq: "x ≠ y ==> lookup (default x d m) y = lookup m y" unfolding lookup_default_def default_def by transfer (auto split: option.splits)
lemma lookup_default': "lookup (default x d m) y = (if x = y then Some (lookup_default d m x) else lookup m y)" unfolding lookup_default_def default_def by transfer (auto split: option.splits)
lemma lookup_map_default: "lookup (map_default x d f m) x = Some (f (lookup_default d m x))" unfolding lookup_default_def default_def by (simp add: map_default_def lookup_map_entry lookup_default lookup_default_def)
lemma lookup_map_default_neq: "x ≠ y ==> lookup (map_default x d f m) y = lookup m y" unfolding lookup_default_def default_def by (simp add: map_default_def lookup_map_entry_neq lookup_default_neq)
lemma lookup_map_default': "lookup (map_default x d f m) y = (if x = y then Some (f (lookup_default d m x)) else lookup m y)" unfolding lookup_default_def default_def by (simp add: map_default_def lookup_map_entry' lookup_default' lookup_default_def)
lemma lookup_tabulate: assumes"distinct xs" shows"Mapping.lookup (Mapping.tabulate xs f) x = (if x ∈ set xs then Some (f x) else None)" using assms by transfer (auto simp: map_of_eq_None_iff o_def dest!: map_of_SomeD)
lemma lookup_of_alist: "lookup (of_alist xs) k = map_of xs k" by transfer simp_all
lemma keys_is_none_rep [code_unfold]: "k ∈ keys m ⟷¬ (Option.is_none (lookup m k))" by transfer (auto simp add: Option.is_none_def)
lemma update_update: "update k v (update k w m) = update k v m" "k ≠ l ==> update k v (update l w m) = update l w (update k v m)" by (transfer; simp add: fun_upd_twist)+
lemma update_delete [simp]: "update k v (delete k m) = update k v m" by transfer simp
lemma delete_update: "delete k (update k v m) = delete k m" "k ≠ l ==> delete k (update l v m) = update l v (delete k m)" by (transfer; simp add: fun_upd_twist)+
lemma delete_empty [simp]: "delete k empty = empty" by transfer simp
lemma Mapping_delete_if_notin_keys[simp]: "k ∉ keys m ==> delete k m = m" by transfer simp
lemma replace_update: "k ∉ keys m ==> replace k v m = m" "k ∈ keys m ==> replace k v m = update k v m" by (transfer; auto simp add: replace_def fun_upd_twist)+
lemma map_values_update: "map_values f (update k v m) = update k (f k v) (map_values f m)" by transfer (simp_all add: fun_eq_iff)
lemma size_mono: "finite (keys m') ==> keys m ⊆ keys m' ==> size m ≤ size m'" unfolding size_def by (auto intro: card_mono)
lemma size_empty [simp]: "size empty = 0" unfolding size_def by transfer simp
lemma size_update: "finite (keys m) ==> size (update k v m) = (if k ∈ keys m then size m else Suc (size m))" unfolding size_def by transfer (auto simp add: insert_dom)
lemma size_delete: "size (delete k m) = (if k ∈ keys m then size m - 1 else size m)" unfolding size_def by transfer simp
lemma sorted_ordered_keys[simp]: "sorted (ordered_keys m)" unfolding ordered_keys_def by simp
lemma ordered_keys_update [simp]: "k ∈ keys m ==> ordered_keys (update k v m) = ordered_keys m" "finite (keys m) ==> k ∉ keys m ==> ordered_keys (update k v m) = insort k (ordered_keys m)" by (simp_all add: ordered_keys_def)
(auto simp only: sorted_list_of_set_insert_remove[symmetric] insert_absorb)
lemma ordered_keys_delete [simp]: "ordered_keys (delete k m) = remove1 k (ordered_keys m)" proof (cases "finite (keys m)") case False thenshow ?thesis by simp next case fin: True show ?thesis proof (cases "k ∈ keys m") case False with fin have"k ∉ set (sorted_list_of_set (keys m))" by simp with False show ?thesis by (simp add: ordered_keys_def remove1_idem) next case True with fin show ?thesis by (simp add: ordered_keys_def sorted_list_of_set_remove) qed qed
lemma ordered_keys_replace [simp]: "ordered_keys (replace k v m) = ordered_keys m" by (simp add: replace_def)
lemma ordered_keys_default [simp]: "k ∈ keys m ==> ordered_keys (default k v m) = ordered_keys m" "finite (keys m) ==> k ∉ keys m ==> ordered_keys (default k v m) = insort k (ordered_keys m)" by (simp_all add: default_def)
lemma ordered_keys_map_entry [simp]: "ordered_keys (map_entry k f m) = ordered_keys m" by (simp add: ordered_keys_def)
lemma ordered_keys_map_default [simp]: "k ∈ keys m ==> ordered_keys (map_default k v f m) = ordered_keys m" "finite (keys m) ==> k ∉ keys m ==> ordered_keys (map_default k v f m) = insort k (ordered_keys m)" by (simp_all add: map_default_def)
lemma tabulate_fold: "tabulate xs f = List.fold (λk m. update k (f k) m) xs empty" proof transfer fix f :: "'a ==> 'b"and xs have"map_of (List.map (λk. (k, f k)) xs) = foldr (λk m. m(k ↦ f k)) xs Map.empty" by (simp add: foldr_map comp_def map_of_foldr) alsohave"foldr (λk m. m(k ↦ f k)) xs = List.fold (λk m. m(k ↦ f k)) xs" by (rule foldr_fold) (simp add: fun_eq_iff) ultimatelyshow"map_of (List.map (λk. (k, f k)) xs) = List.fold (λk m. m(k ↦ f k)) xs Map.empty" by simp qed
lemma All_mapping_mono: "(∧k v. k ∈ keys m ==> P k v ==> Q k v) ==> All_mapping m P ==> All_mapping m Q" unfolding All_mapping_def by transfer (auto simp: All_mapping_def dom_def split: option.splits)
lemma All_mapping_update_iff: "All_mapping (Mapping.update k v m) P ⟷ P k v ∧ All_mapping m (λk' v'. k = k' ∨ P k' v')" unfolding All_mapping_def proof safe assume"∀x. case Mapping.lookup (Mapping.update k v m) x of None ==> True | Some y ==> P x y" thenhave *: "case Mapping.lookup (Mapping.update k v m) x of None ==> True | Some y ==> P x y"for x by blast from *[of k] show"P k v" by (simp add: lookup_update) show"case Mapping.lookup m x of None ==> True | Some v' ==> k = x ∨ P x v'"for x using *[of x] by (auto simp add: lookup_update' split: if_splits option.splits) next assume"P k v" assume"∀x. case Mapping.lookup m x of None ==> True | Some v' ==> k = x ∨ P x v'" thenhave A: "case Mapping.lookup m x of None ==> True | Some v' ==> k = x ∨ P x v'"for x by blast show"case Mapping.lookup (Mapping.update k v m) x of None ==> True | Some xa ==> P x xa"for x using‹P k v› A[of x] by (auto simp: lookup_update' split: option.splits) qed
lemma All_mapping_update: "P k v ==> All_mapping m (λk' v'. k = k' ∨ P k' v') ==> All_mapping (Mapping.update k v m) P" by (simp add: All_mapping_update_iff)
lemma All_mapping_filter_iff: "All_mapping (filter P m) Q ⟷ All_mapping m (λk v. P k v ⟶ Q k v)" by (auto simp: All_mapping_def lookup_filter split: option.splits)
lemma All_mapping_filter: "All_mapping m Q ==> All_mapping (filter P m) Q" by (auto simp: All_mapping_filter_iff intro: All_mapping_mono)
lemma All_mapping_map_values: "All_mapping (map_values f m) P ⟷ All_mapping m (λk v. P k (f k v))" by (auto simp: All_mapping_def lookup_map_values split: option.splits)
lemma All_mapping_tabulate: "(∀x∈set xs. P x (f x)) ==> All_mapping (Mapping.tabulate xs f) P" unfolding All_mapping_def by transfer (auto split: option.split dest!: map_of_SomeD)
lemma All_mapping_alist: "(∧k v. (k, v) ∈ set xs ==> P k v) ==> All_mapping (Mapping.of_alist xs) P" by (auto simp: All_mapping_def lookup_of_alist dest!: map_of_SomeD split: option.splits)
lemma combine_empty [simp]: "combine f Mapping.empty y = y""combine f y Mapping.empty = y" by (transfer; force)+
lemma (in abel_semigroup) comm_monoid_set_combine: "comm_monoid_set (combine f) Mapping.empty" by standard (transfer fixing: f, simp add: combine_options_ac[of f] ac_simps)+
locale combine_mapping_abel_semigroup = abel_semigroup begin
sublocale combine: comm_monoid_set "combine f" Mapping.empty by (rule comm_monoid_set_combine)
lemma fold_combine_code: "combine.F g (set xs) = foldr (λx. combine f (g x)) (remdups xs) Mapping.empty" proof - have"combine.F g (set xs) = foldr (λx. combine f (g x)) xs Mapping.empty" if"distinct xs"for xs using that by (induction xs) simp_all from this[of "remdups xs"] show ?thesis by simp qed
lemma keys_fold_combine: "finite A ==> Mapping.keys (combine.F g A) = (∪x∈A. Mapping.keys (g x))" by (induct A rule: finite_induct) simp_all
sublocale folding_Map_graph: folding_insort_key "(≤)""(<)""Map.graph m" fst for m by unfold_locales (fact inj_on_fst_graph)
end
lemma sorted_fst_list_of_set_insort_Map_graph[simp]: assumes"finite (dom m)""fst x ∉ dom m" shows"sorted_key_list_of_set fst (insert x (Map.graph m)) = insort_key fst x (sorted_key_list_of_set fst (Map.graph m))" proof(cases x) case (Pair k v) with‹fst x ∉ dom m›have"Map.graph m ⊆ Map.graph (m(k ↦ v))" by(auto simp: graph_def) moreoverfrom Pair ‹fst x ∉ dom m›have"(k, v) ∉ Map.graph m" using graph_domD by fastforce ultimatelyshow ?thesis using Pair assms folding_Map_graph.sorted_key_list_of_set_insert[where ?m="m(k ↦ v)"] by auto qed
lemma sorted_fst_list_of_set_insort_insert_Map_graph[simp]: assumes"finite (dom m)""fst x ∉ dom m" shows"sorted_key_list_of_set fst (insert x (Map.graph m)) = insort_insert_key fst x (sorted_key_list_of_set fst (Map.graph m))" proof(cases x) case (Pair k v) with‹fst x ∉ dom m›have"Map.graph m ⊆ Map.graph (m(k ↦ v))" by(auto simp: graph_def) with assms Pair show ?thesis unfolding sorted_fst_list_of_set_insort_Map_graph[OF assms] insort_insert_key_def using folding_Map_graph.set_sorted_key_list_of_set in_graphD by (fastforce split: if_splits) qed
lemma linorder_finite_Map_induct[consumes 1, case_names empty update]: fixes m :: "'a::linorder ⇀ 'b" assumes"finite (dom m)" assumes"P Map.empty" assumes"∧k v m. [ finite (dom m); k ∉ dom m; (∧k'. k' ∈ dom m ==> k' ≤ k); P m ] ==> P (m(k ↦ v))" shows"P m" proof - let ?key_list = "λm. sorted_list_of_set (dom m)" from assms(1,2) show ?thesis proof(induction"length (?key_list m)" arbitrary: m) case 0 thenhave"sorted_list_of_set (dom m) = []" by auto with‹finite (dom m)›have"m = Map.empty" by auto with‹P Map.empty›show ?caseby simp next case (Suc n) thenobtain x xs where x_xs: "sorted_list_of_set (dom m) = xs @ [x]" by (metis append_butlast_last_id length_greater_0_conv zero_less_Suc) have"sorted_list_of_set (dom (m(x := None))) = xs" proof - have"distinct (xs @ [x])" by (metis sorted_list_of_set.distinct_sorted_key_list_of_set x_xs) thenhave"remove1 x (xs @ [x]) = xs" by (simp add: remove1_append) with‹finite (dom m)› x_xs show ?thesis by (simp add: sorted_list_of_set_remove) qed moreoverhave"k ≤ x"if"k ∈ dom (m(x := None))"for k proof - from x_xs have"sorted (xs @ [x])" by (metis sorted_list_of_set.sorted_sorted_key_list_of_set) moreoverfrom‹k ∈ dom (m(x := None))›have"k ∈ set xs" using‹finite (dom m)›‹sorted_list_of_set (dom (m(x := None))) = xs› by auto ultimatelyshow"k ≤ x" by (simp add: sorted_append) qed moreoverfrom‹finite (dom m)›have"finite (dom (m(x := None)))""x ∉ dom (m(x := None))" by simp_all moreoverhave"P (m(x := None))" using Suc ‹sorted_list_of_set (dom (m(x := None))) = xs› x_xs by auto ultimatelyshow ?case using assms(3)[where ?m="m(x := None)"] by (metis fun_upd_triv fun_upd_upd not_Some_eq) qed qed
lemma delete_insort_fst[simp]: "AList.delete k (insort_key fst (k, v) xs) = AList.delete k xs" by (induction xs) simp_all
lemma insort_fst_delete: "[ fst x ≠ k2; sorted (List.map fst xs) ] ==> insort_key fst x (AList.delete k2 xs) = AList.delete k2 (insort_key fst x xs)" by (induction xs) (fastforce simp add: insort_is_Cons order_trans)+
lemma sorted_fst_list_of_set_Map_graph_fun_upd_None[simp]: "sorted_key_list_of_set fst (Map.graph (m(k := None))) = AList.delete k (sorted_key_list_of_set fst (Map.graph m))" proof(cases "finite (Map.graph m)") assume"finite (Map.graph m)" from this[unfolded finite_graph_iff_finite_dom] show ?thesis proof(induction rule: finite_Map_induct) let ?list_of="sorted_key_list_of_set fst" case (update k2 v2 m) note [simp] = ‹k2 ∉ dom m›‹finite (dom m)›
have right_eq: "AList.delete k (?list_of (Map.graph (m(k2 ↦ v2)))) = AList.delete k (insort_key fst (k2, v2) (?list_of (Map.graph m)))" by simp
show ?case proof(cases "k = k2") case True thenhave"?list_of (Map.graph ((m(k2 ↦ v2))(k := None))) = AList.delete k (insort_key fst (k2, v2) (?list_of (Map.graph m)))" using fst_graph_eq_dom update.IH by auto thenshow ?thesis using right_eq by metis next case False thenhave"AList.delete k (insort_key fst (k2, v2) (?list_of (Map.graph m))) = insort_key fst (k2, v2) (?list_of (Map.graph (m(k := None))))" by (auto simp add: insort_fst_delete update.IH
folding_Map_graph.sorted_sorted_key_list_of_set[OF subset_refl]) alsohave"… = ?list_of (insert (k2, v2) (Map.graph (m(k := None))))" by auto alsofrom False ‹k2 ∉ dom m›have"… = ?list_of (Map.graph ((m(k2 ↦ v2))(k := None)))" by (metis graph_map_upd domIff fun_upd_triv fun_upd_twist) finallyshow ?thesis using right_eq by metis qed qed simp qed simp
lemma entries_empty[simp]: "entries empty = {}" by transfer (fact graph_empty)
lemma entries_lookup: "entries m = Map.graph (lookup m)" by transfer rule
lemma in_entriesI: "lookup m k = Some v ==> (k, v) ∈ entries m" by transfer (fact in_graphI)
lemma in_entriesD: "(k, v) ∈ entries m ==> lookup m k = Some v" by transfer (fact in_graphD)
lemma fst_image_entries_eq_keys[simp]: "fst ` Mapping.entries m = Mapping.keys m" by transfer (fact fst_graph_eq_dom)
lemma finite_entries_iff_finite_keys[simp]: "finite (entries m) = finite (keys m)" by transfer (fact finite_graph_iff_finite_dom)
lemma entries_update: "entries (update k v m) = insert (k, v) (entries (delete k m))" by transfer (fact graph_map_upd)
lemma entries_delete: "entries (delete k m) = {e ∈ entries m. fst e ≠ k}" by transfer (fact graph_fun_upd_None)
lemma entries_of_alist[simp]: "distinct (List.map fst xs) ==> entries (of_alist xs) = set xs" by transfer (fact graph_map_of_if_distinct_dom)
lemma entries_keysD: "x ∈ entries m ==> fst x ∈ keys m" by transfer (fact graph_domD)
lemma set_ordered_entries[simp]: "finite (keys m) ==> set (ordered_entries m) = entries m" unfolding ordered_entries_def by transfer (auto simp: folding_Map_graph.set_sorted_key_list_of_set[OF subset_refl])
lemma distinct_ordered_entries[simp]: "distinct (List.map fst (ordered_entries m))" unfolding ordered_entries_def by transfer (simp add: folding_Map_graph.distinct_sorted_key_list_of_set[OF subset_refl])
lemma sorted_ordered_entries[simp]: "sorted (List.map fst (ordered_entries m))" unfolding ordered_entries_def by transfer (auto intro: folding_Map_graph.sorted_sorted_key_list_of_set)
lemma ordered_entries_infinite[simp]: "¬ finite (Mapping.keys m) ==> ordered_entries m = []" by (simp add: ordered_entries_def)
lemma ordered_entries_empty[simp]: "ordered_entries empty = []" by (simp add: ordered_entries_def)
lemma ordered_entries_update[simp]: assumes"finite (keys m)" shows"ordered_entries (update k v m) = insort_insert_key fst (k, v) (AList.delete k (ordered_entries m))" proof - let ?list_of="sorted_key_list_of_set fst"and ?insort="insort_insert_key fst"
have *: "?list_of (insert (k, v) (Map.graph (m(k := None)))) = ?insort (k, v) (AList.delete k (?list_of (Map.graph m)))"if"finite (dom m)"form proof - from‹finite (dom m)›have"?list_of (insert (k, v) (Map.graph (m(k := None)))) = ?insort (k, v) (?list_of (Map.graph (m(k := None))))" by (intro sorted_fst_list_of_set_insort_insert_Map_graph) (simp_all add: subset_insertI) thenshow ?thesis by simp qed from assms show ?thesis unfolding ordered_entries_def by (transfer fixing: k v) (use"*"in auto) qed
lemma ordered_entries_delete[simp]: "ordered_entries (delete k m) = AList.delete k (ordered_entries m)" unfolding ordered_entries_def by transfer auto
lemma map_fst_ordered_entries[simp]: "List.map fst (ordered_entries m) = ordered_keys m" proof(cases "finite (Mapping.keys m)") case True thenhave"set (List.map fst (Mapping.ordered_entries m)) = set (Mapping.ordered_keys m)" unfolding ordered_entries_def ordered_keys_def by (transfer) (simp add: folding_Map_graph.set_sorted_key_list_of_set[OF subset_refl] fst_graph_eq_dom) with True show"List.map fst (Mapping.ordered_entries m) = Mapping.ordered_keys m" by (metis distinct_ordered_entries ordered_keys_def sorted_list_of_set.idem_if_sorted_distinct
sorted_list_of_set.set_sorted_key_list_of_set sorted_ordered_entries) next case False thenshow ?thesis unfolding ordered_entries_def ordered_keys_def by simp qed
lemma fold_empty[simp]: "fold f empty a = a" unfolding fold_def by simp
lemma insort_key_is_snoc_if_sorted_and_distinct: assumes"sorted (List.map f xs)""f y ∉ f ` set xs""∀x ∈ set xs. f x ≤ f y" shows"insort_key f y xs = xs @ [y]" using assms by (induction xs) (auto dest!: insort_is_Cons)
lemma fold_update: assumes"finite (keys m)" assumes"k ∉ keys m""∧k'. k' ∈ keys m ==> k' ≤ k" shows"fold f (update k v m) a = f k v (fold f m a)" proof - from assms have k_notin_entries: "k ∉ fst ` set (ordered_entries m)" using entries_keysD by fastforce with assms have"ordered_entries (update k v m) = insort_insert_key fst (k, v) (ordered_entries m)" by simp alsofrom k_notin_entries have"… = ordered_entries m @ [(k, v)]" proof - from assms have"∀x ∈ set (ordered_entries m). fst x ≤ fst (k, v)" unfolding ordered_entries_def by transfer (fastforce simp: folding_Map_graph.set_sorted_key_list_of_set[OF order_refl]
dest: graph_domD) from insort_key_is_snoc_if_sorted_and_distinct[OF _ _ this] k_notin_entries ‹finite (keys m)› show ?thesis using sorted_ordered_keys unfolding insort_insert_key_def by auto qed finallyshow ?thesis unfolding fold_def by simp qed
lemma linorder_finite_Mapping_induct[consumes 1, case_names empty update]: fixes m :: "('a::linorder, 'b) mapping" assumes"finite (keys m)" assumes"P empty" assumes"∧k v m. [ finite (keys m); k ∉ keys m; (∧k'. k' ∈ keys m ==> k' ≤ k); P m ] ==> P (update k v m)" shows"P m" using assms by transfer (simp add: linorder_finite_Map_induct)
Die Informationen auf dieser Webseite wurden
nach bestem Wissen sorgfältig zusammengestellt. Es wird jedoch weder Vollständigkeit, noch Richtigkeit,
noch Qualität der bereit gestellten Informationen zugesichert.
Bemerkung:
Die farbliche Syntaxdarstellung und die Messung sind noch experimentell.