(* Title: HOL/Isar_Examples/Fibonacci.thy
Author: Gertrud Bauer
Copyright 1999 Technische Universitaet Muenchen
The Fibonacci function. Original
tactic script by Lawrence C Paulson.
Fibonacci numbers: proofs of laws taken from
R. L. Graham, D. E. Knuth, O. Patashnik.
Concrete Mathematics.
(Addison-Wesley, 1989)
*)
section ‹Fib
and Gcd commute
›
theory Fibonacci
imports "HOL-Computational_Algebra.Primes"
begin
text_raw ‹🚫‹Isar version
by Gertrud Bauer. Original tactic script
by Larry
Paulson. A few proofs of laws taken
from 🍋‹"Concrete-Math"›.
››
subsection ‹Fibonacci numbers
›
fun fib ::
"nat \ nat"
where
"fib 0 = 0"
|
"fib (Suc 0) = 1"
|
"fib (Suc (Suc x)) = fib x + fib (Suc x)"
lemma [simp]:
"fib (Suc n) > 0"
by (induct n rule: fib.induct) simp_all
text ‹Alternative
induction rule.
›
theorem fib_induct:
"P 0 \ P 1 \ (\n. P (n + 1) \ P n \ P (n + 2)) \ P n"
for n :: nat
by (induct rule: fib.induct) simp_all
subsection ‹Fib
and gcd commute
›
text ‹A few laws taken
from 🍋‹"Concrete-Math"›.
›
lemma fib_add:
"fib (n + k + 1) = fib (k + 1) * fib (n + 1) + fib k * fib n"
(
is "?P n")
🍋 ‹see
🍋‹‹page 280
› in "Concrete-Math"››
proof (induct n rule: fib_induct)
show "?P 0" by simp
show "?P 1" by simp
fix n
have "fib (n + 2 + k + 1)
= fib (n + k + 1) + fib (n + 1 + k + 1)
" by simp
also assume "fib (n + k + 1) = fib (k + 1) * fib (n + 1) + fib k * fib n" (
is " _ = ?R1")
also assume "fib (n + 1 + k + 1) = fib (k + 1) * fib (n + 1 + 1) + fib k * fib (n + 1)"
(
is " _ = ?R2")
also have "?R1 + ?R2 = fib (k + 1) * fib (n + 2 + 1) + fib k * fib (n + 2)"
by (simp add: add_mult_distrib2)
finally show "?P (n + 2)" .
qed
lemma coprime_fib_Suc:
"coprime (fib n) (fib (n + 1))"
(
is "?P n")
proof (induct n rule: fib_induct)
show "?P 0" by simp
show "?P 1" by simp
fix n
assume P:
"coprime (fib (n + 1)) (fib (n + 1 + 1))"
have "fib (n + 2 + 1) = fib (n + 1) + fib (n + 2)"
by simp
also have "\ = fib (n + 2) + fib (n + 1)"
by simp
also have "gcd (fib (n + 2)) \ = gcd (fib (n + 2)) (fib (n + 1))"
by (rule gcd_add2)
also have "\ = gcd (fib (n + 1)) (fib (n + 1 + 1))"
by (simp add: gcd.commute)
also have "\ = 1"
using P
by simp
finally show "?P (n + 2)"
by (simp add: coprime_iff_gcd_eq_1)
qed
lemma gcd_mult_add:
"(0::nat) < n \ gcd (n * k + m) n = gcd m n"
proof -
assume "0 < n"
then have "gcd (n * k + m) n = gcd n (m mod n)"
by (simp add: gcd_non_0_nat add.commute)
also from ‹0 < n
› have "\ = gcd m n"
by (simp add: gcd_non_0_nat)
finally show ?thesis .
qed
lemma gcd_fib_add:
"gcd (fib m) (fib (n + m)) = gcd (fib m) (fib n)"
proof (cases m)
case 0
then show ?thesis
by simp
next
case (Suc k)
then have "gcd (fib m) (fib (n + m)) = gcd (fib (n + k + 1)) (fib (k + 1))"
by (simp add: gcd.commute)
also have "fib (n + k + 1) = fib (k + 1) * fib (n + 1) + fib k * fib n"
by (rule fib_add)
also have "gcd \ (fib (k + 1)) = gcd (fib k * fib n) (fib (k + 1))"
by (simp add: gcd_mult_add)
also have "\ = gcd (fib n) (fib (k + 1))"
using coprime_fib_Suc [of k] gcd_mult_left_right_cancel [of
"fib (k + 1)" "fib k" "fib n"]
by (simp add: ac_simps)
also have "\ = gcd (fib m) (fib n)"
using Suc
by (simp add: gcd.commute)
finally show ?thesis .
qed
lemma gcd_fib_diff:
"gcd (fib m) (fib (n - m)) = gcd (fib m) (fib n)" if "m \ n"
proof -
have "gcd (fib m) (fib (n - m)) = gcd (fib m) (fib (n - m + m))"
by (simp add: gcd_fib_add)
also from ‹m
≤ n
› have "n - m + m = n"
by simp
finally show ?thesis .
qed
lemma gcd_fib_mod:
"gcd (fib m) (fib (n mod m)) = gcd (fib m) (fib n)" if "0 < m"
proof (induct n rule: nat_less_induct)
case hyp: (1 n)
show ?
case
proof -
have "n mod m = (if n < m then n else (n - m) mod m)"
by (rule mod_if)
also have "gcd (fib m) (fib \) = gcd (fib m) (fib n)"
proof (cases
"n < m")
case True
then show ?thesis
by simp
next
case False
then have "m \ n" by simp
from ‹0 < m
› and False
have "n - m < n"
by simp
with hyp
have "gcd (fib m) (fib ((n - m) mod m))
= gcd (fib m) (fib (n - m))
" by simp
also have "\ = gcd (fib m) (fib n)"
using ‹m
≤ n
› by (rule gcd_fib_diff)
finally have "gcd (fib m) (fib ((n - m) mod m)) =
gcd (fib m) (fib n)
" .
with False
show ?thesis
by simp
qed
finally show ?thesis .
qed
qed
theorem fib_gcd:
"fib (gcd m n) = gcd (fib m) (fib n)"
(
is "?P m n")
proof (induct m n rule: gcd_nat_induct)
fix m n :: nat
show "fib (gcd m 0) = gcd (fib m) (fib 0)"
by simp
assume n:
"0 < n"
then have "gcd m n = gcd n (m mod n)"
by (simp add: gcd_non_0_nat)
also assume hyp:
"fib \ = gcd (fib n) (fib (m mod n))"
also from n
have "\ = gcd (fib n) (fib m)"
by (rule gcd_fib_mod)
also have "\ = gcd (fib m) (fib n)"
by (rule gcd.commute)
finally show "fib (gcd m n) = gcd (fib m) (fib n)" .
qed
end