(* Title: HOL/HOLCF/Sfun.thy
Author: Brian Huffman
*)
section ‹ The Strict Function Type›
theory Sfun
imports Cfun
begin
pcpodef ('a::pcpo, ' b::pcpo) sfun (infixr ‹ → !› 0) = "{f :: 'a \ 'b. f\\ = \}"
by simp_all
type_notation (ASCII)
sfun (infixr ‹ ->!› 0)
text ‹ TODO: Define nice syntax for abstraction, application.›
definition sfun_abs :: "('a::pcpo \ 'b::pcpo) \ ('a \! 'b)"
where "sfun_abs = (\ f. Abs_sfun (strictify\f))"
definition sfun_rep :: "('a::pcpo \! 'b::pcpo) \ 'a \ 'b"
where "sfun_rep = (\ f. Rep_sfun f)"
lemma sfun_rep_beta: "sfun_rep\f = Rep_sfun f"
by (simp add: sfun_rep_def cont_Rep_sfun)
lemma sfun_rep_strict1 [simp]: "sfun_rep\\ = \"
unfolding sfun_rep_beta by (rule Rep_sfun_strict)
lemma sfun_rep_strict2 [simp]: "sfun_rep\f\\ = \"
unfolding sfun_rep_beta by (rule Rep_sfun [simplified])
lemma strictify_cancel: "f\\ = \ \ strictify\f = f"
by (simp add: cfun_eq_iff strictify_conv_if)
lemma sfun_abs_sfun_rep [simp]: "sfun_abs\(sfun_rep\f) = f"
unfolding sfun_abs_def sfun_rep_def
apply (simp add: cont_Abs_sfun cont_Rep_sfun)
apply (simp add: Rep_sfun_inject [symmetric] Abs_sfun_inverse)
apply (simp add: cfun_eq_iff strictify_conv_if)
apply (simp add: Rep_sfun [simplified])
done
lemma sfun_rep_sfun_abs [simp]: "sfun_rep\(sfun_abs\f) = strictify\f"
unfolding sfun_abs_def sfun_rep_def
apply (simp add: cont_Abs_sfun cont_Rep_sfun)
apply (simp add: Abs_sfun_inverse)
done
lemma sfun_eq_iff: "f = g \ sfun_rep\f = sfun_rep\g"
by (simp add: sfun_rep_def cont_Rep_sfun Rep_sfun_inject)
lemma sfun_below_iff: "f \ g \ sfun_rep\f \ sfun_rep\g"
by (simp add: sfun_rep_def cont_Rep_sfun below_sfun_def)
end
Messung V0.5 C=99 H=96 G=97
¤ Dauer der Verarbeitung: 0.12 Sekunden
(vorverarbeitet)
¤
*© Formatika GbR, Deutschland