(* Author: Tobias Nipkow *)
section ‹ Lists Sorted wrt $🚫 ›
theory Sorted_Less
imports Less_False
begin
hide_const sorted
text ‹ Is a list sorted without duplicates, i.e., wrt ‹ 🚫 close>?.›
abbreviation sorted :: "'a::linorder list ==> bool" where
"sorted ≡ sorted_wrt (<)"
lemmas sorted_wrt_Cons = sorted_wrt.simps(2)
text ‹ The definition of 🍋 ‹ sorted_wrt› relates each element to all the elements after it.
This causes a blowup of the formulas. Thus we simplify matters by only comparing adjacent elements. ›
declare
sorted_wrt.simps(2)[simp del]
sorted_wrt1[simp] sorted_wrt2[OF transp_on_less, simp]
lemma sorted_cons: "sorted (x#xs) ==> sorted xs"
by (simp add: sorted_wrt_Cons)
lemma sorted_cons': "ASSUMPTION (sorted (x#xs)) ==> sorted xs"
by (rule ASSUMPTION_D [THEN sorted_cons])
lemma sorted_snoc: "sorted (xs @ [y]) ==> sorted xs"
by (simp add: sorted_wrt_append)
lemma sorted_snoc': "ASSUMPTION (sorted (xs @ [y])) ==> sorted xs"
by (rule ASSUMPTION_D [THEN sorted_snoc])
lemma sorted_mid_iff:
"sorted(xs @ y # ys) = (sorted(xs @ [y]) ∧ sorted(y # ys))"
by (fastforce simp add: sorted_wrt_Cons sorted_wrt_append)
lemma sorted_mid_iff2:
"sorted(x # xs @ y # ys) =
(sorted(x # xs) ∧ x < y ∧ sorted(xs @ [y]) ∧ sorted(y # ys))"
by (fastforce simp add: sorted_wrt_Cons sorted_wrt_append)
lemma sorted_mid_iff': "NO_MATCH [] ys ==>
sorted(xs @ y # ys) = (sorted(xs @ [y]) ∧ sorted(y # ys))"
by (rule sorted_mid_iff)
lemmas sorted_lems = sorted_mid_iff' sorted_mid_iff2 sorted_cons' sorted_snoc'
text ‹ Splay trees need two additional 🍋 ‹ sorted› lemmas:›
lemma sorted_snoc_le:
"ASSUMPTION(sorted(xs @ [x])) ==> x ≤ y ==> sorted (xs @ [y])"
by (auto simp add: sorted_wrt_append ASSUMPTION_def)
lemma sorted_Cons_le:
"ASSUMPTION(sorted(x # xs)) ==> y ≤ x ==> sorted (y # xs)"
by (auto simp add: sorted_wrt_Cons ASSUMPTION_def)
end
Messung V0.5 in Prozent C=86 H=64 G=75
¤ Dauer der Verarbeitung: 0.1 Sekunden
(vorverarbeitet am 2026-04-26)
¤
*© Formatika GbR, Deutschland