// Note we can only do CHA guard elimination/motion in a single pass, since // if a guard is not removed, another guard might be removed due to // the existence of the first guard. The first guard should not be further // removed in another pass. For example, due to further optimizations, // a receiver of a guard might turn out to be a parameter value, or defined at // a different site, which makes the guard removable as a result. However // it's not safe to remove the guard in another pass since another guard might // have been removed due to the existence of this guard. // // As a consequence, we decided not to rely on other passes to remove them // (such as GVN or instruction simplifier).
class CHAGuardVisitor final : public HGraphVisitor { public: explicit CHAGuardVisitor(HGraph* graph)
: HGraphVisitor(graph),
block_has_cha_guard_(GetGraph()->GetBlocks().size(), 0,
graph->GetAllocator()->Adapter(kArenaAllocCHA)),
instruction_iterator_(nullptr) {
number_of_guards_to_visit_ = GetGraph()->GetNumberOfCHAGuards();
DCHECK_NE(number_of_guards_to_visit_, 0u); // Will recount number of guards during guard optimization.
GetGraph()->SetNumberOfCHAGuards(0);
}
private: void RemoveGuard(HShouldDeoptimizeFlag* flag); // Return true if `flag` is removed. bool OptimizeForParameter(HShouldDeoptimizeFlag* flag, HInstruction* receiver); // Return true if `flag` is removed. bool OptimizeWithDominatingGuard(HShouldDeoptimizeFlag* flag, HInstruction* receiver); // Return true if `flag` is hoisted. bool HoistGuard(HShouldDeoptimizeFlag* flag, HInstruction* receiver);
// Record if each block has any CHA guard. It's updated during the // reverse post order visit. Use int instead of bool since ArenaVector // does not support bool.
ArenaVector<int> block_has_cha_guard_;
// The iterator that's being used for this visitor. Need it to manually // advance the iterator due to removing/moving more than one instruction.
HInstructionIteratorPrefetchNext* instruction_iterator_;
// Used to short-circuit the pass when there is no more guards left to visit.
uint32_t number_of_guards_to_visit_;
DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN(CHAGuardVisitor);
};
void CHAGuardVisitor::VisitBasicBlock(HBasicBlock* block) { if (number_of_guards_to_visit_ == 0) { return;
} // Skip phis, just iterate through instructions.
HInstructionIteratorPrefetchNext it(block->GetInstructions());
instruction_iterator_ = ⁢ for (; !it.Done(); it.Advance()) {
DCHECK(it.Current()->IsInBlock());
Dispatch(it.Current());
}
}
// Advance instruction iterator first before we remove the guard. // We need to do it twice since we remove three instructions and the // visitor is responsible for advancing it once.
instruction_iterator_->Advance();
instruction_iterator_->Advance();
block->RemoveInstruction(deopt);
block->RemoveInstruction(compare);
block->RemoveInstruction(flag);
}
bool CHAGuardVisitor::OptimizeForParameter(HShouldDeoptimizeFlag* flag,
HInstruction* receiver) { // If some compiled code is invalidated by CHA due to class loading, the // compiled code will not be entered anymore. So the very fact that the // compiled code is invoked guarantees that a parameter receiver conforms // to all the CHA devirtualization assumptions made by the compiled code, // since all parameter receivers pre-exist any (potential) invalidation of // the compiled code. // // TODO: allow more cases such as a phi whose inputs are all parameters. if (receiver->IsParameterValue()) {
RemoveGuard(flag); returntrue;
} returnfalse;
}
bool CHAGuardVisitor::OptimizeWithDominatingGuard(HShouldDeoptimizeFlag* flag,
HInstruction* receiver) { // If there is another guard that dominates the current guard, and // that guard is dominated by receiver's definition, then the current // guard can be eliminated, since receiver must pre-exist that other // guard, and passing that guard guarantees that receiver conforms to // all the CHA devirtualization assumptions.
HBasicBlock* dominator = flag->GetBlock();
HBasicBlock* receiver_def_block = receiver->GetBlock();
// Complexity of the following algorithm: // We potentially need to traverse the full dominator chain to receiver_def_block, // plus a (partial) linear search within one block for each guard. // So the worst case for each guard is bounded by the size of the // biggest block plus the depth of the dominating tree.
while (dominator != receiver_def_block) { if (block_has_cha_guard_[dominator->GetBlockId()] == 1) {
RemoveGuard(flag); returntrue;
}
dominator = dominator->GetDominator();
}
// At this point dominator is the block where receiver is defined. // We do a linear search within dominator to see if there is a guard after // receiver's definition.
HInstruction* instruction; if (dominator == flag->GetBlock()) { // Flag and receiver are defined in the same block. Search backward from // the current guard.
instruction = flag->GetPrevious();
} else { // Search backward from the last instruction of that dominator.
instruction = dominator->GetLastInstruction();
} while (instruction != receiver) { if (instruction == nullptr) { // receiver must be defined in this block, we didn't find it // in the instruction list, so it must be a Phi.
DCHECK(receiver->IsPhi()); break;
} if (instruction->IsShouldDeoptimizeFlag()) {
RemoveGuard(flag); returntrue;
}
instruction = instruction->GetPrevious();
} returnfalse;
}
bool CHAGuardVisitor::HoistGuard(HShouldDeoptimizeFlag* flag,
HInstruction* receiver) { // If receiver is loop invariant, we can hoist the guard out of the // loop since passing a guard before entering the loop guarantees that // receiver conforms to all the CHA devirtualization assumptions. // We only hoist guards out of the inner loop since that offers most of the // benefit and it might help remove other guards in the inner loop.
HBasicBlock* block = flag->GetBlock();
HLoopInformation* loop_info = block->GetLoopInformation(); if (loop_info != nullptr &&
!loop_info->IsIrreducible() &&
loop_info->IsDefinedOutOfTheLoop(receiver)) {
HInstruction* compare = flag->GetNext();
DCHECK(compare->IsNotEqual());
HInstruction* deopt = compare->GetNext();
DCHECK(deopt->IsDeoptimize());
// Advance instruction iterator first before we move the guard. // We need to do it twice since we move three instructions and the // visitor is responsible for advancing it once.
instruction_iterator_->Advance();
instruction_iterator_->Advance();
block->RemoveInstruction(deopt);
HInstruction* suspend = loop_info->GetSuspendCheck();
DCHECK(suspend != nullptr); // Need a new deoptimize instruction that copies the environment // of the suspend instruction for the loop.
HDeoptimize* deoptimize = new (GetGraph()->GetAllocator()) HDeoptimize(
GetGraph()->GetAllocator(), compare, DeoptimizationKind::kCHA, suspend->GetDexPc());
pre_header->InsertInstructionBefore(deoptimize, pre_header->GetLastInstruction());
deoptimize->CopyEnvironmentFromWithLoopPhiAdjustment(
suspend->GetEnvironment(), loop_info->GetHeader());
block_has_cha_guard_[pre_header->GetBlockId()] = 1;
GetGraph()->IncrementNumberOfCHAGuards(); returntrue;
} returnfalse;
}
void CHAGuardVisitor::VisitShouldDeoptimizeFlag(HShouldDeoptimizeFlag* flag) {
number_of_guards_to_visit_--;
HInstruction* receiver = flag->InputAt(0); // Don't need the receiver anymore.
flag->RemoveInputAt(0); if (receiver->IsNullCheck()) {
receiver = receiver->InputAt(0);
}
if (OptimizeForParameter(flag, receiver)) {
DCHECK(!flag->IsInBlock()); return;
} if (OptimizeWithDominatingGuard(flag, receiver)) {
DCHECK(!flag->IsInBlock()); return;
} if (HoistGuard(flag, receiver)) {
DCHECK(flag->IsInBlock()); return;
}
// Need to keep the CHA guard in place.
block_has_cha_guard_[flag->GetBlock()->GetBlockId()] = 1;
GetGraph()->IncrementNumberOfCHAGuards();
}
Die Informationen auf dieser Webseite wurden
nach bestem Wissen sorgfältig zusammengestellt. Es wird jedoch weder Vollständigkeit, noch Richtigkeit,
noch Qualität der bereit gestellten Informationen zugesichert.
Bemerkung:
Die farbliche Syntaxdarstellung und die Messung sind noch experimentell.