Quelle rewpatterns.v Sprache: Coq

(************************************************************************)
(*         *      The Rocq Prover / The Rocq Development Team           *)
(*  v      *         Copyright INRIA, CNRS and contributors             *)
(* <O___,, * (see version control and CREDITS file for authors & dates) *)
(*   \VV/  **************************************************************)
(*    //   *    This file is distributed under the terms of the         *)
(*         *     GNU Lesser General Public License Version 2.1          *)
(*         *     (see LICENSE file for the text of the license)         *)
(************************************************************************)

(* (c) Copyright 2006-2016 Microsoft Corporation and Inria.                  *)

Require Import ssreflect.
Require Import ssrbool ssrfun TestSuite.ssr_mini_mathcomp.

Lemma test1 : forall x y (f : nat -> nat), f (x + y).+1 = f (y + x.+1).
by move=> x y f; rewrite [_.+1](addnC x.+1).
Qed.

Lemma test2 : forall x y f, x + y + f (y + x) + f (y + x) = x + y + f (y + x) + f (x + y).
by move=> x y f; rewrite {2}[in f _]addnC.
Qed.

Lemma test2' : forall x y f, true && f (x * (y + x)) = true && f(x * (x + y)).
by move=> x y f; rewrite [in f _](addnC y).
Qed.

Lemma test2'' : forall x y f, f (y + x) + f(y + x) + f(y + x)  = f(x + y) + f(y + x) + f(x + y).
by move=> x y f; rewrite {1 3}[in f _](addnC y).
Qed.

(* patterns catching bound vars not supported *)
Lemma test2_1 : forall x y f, true && (let z := x in f (z * (y + x))) = true && f(x * (x + y)).
by move=> x y f; rewrite [in f _](addnC x). (* put y when bound var will be OK *)
Qed.

Lemma test3 : forall x y f, x + f (x + y) (f (y + x) x) = x + f (x + y) (f (x + y) x).
by move=> x y f; rewrite [in X in (f _ X)](addnC y).
Qed.

Lemma test3' : forall x y f, x = y -> x + f (x + x) x + f (x + x) x =
                                      x + f (x + y) x + f (y + x) x.
by move=> x y f E; rewrite {2 3}[in X in (f X _)]E.
Qed.

Lemma test3'' : forall x y f, x = y -> x + f (x + y) x + f (x + y) x =
                                       x + f (x + y) x + f (y + y) x.
by move=> x y f E; rewrite {2}[in X in (f X _)]E.
Qed.

Lemma test4 : forall x y f, x = y -> x + f (fun _ : nat => x + x) x + f (fun _ => x + x) x =
                                     x + f (fun _       => x + y) x + f (fun _ => y + x) x.
by move=> x y f E; rewrite {2 3}[in X in (f X _)]E.
Qed.

Lemma test4' : forall x y f, x = y -> x + f (fun _ _ _ : nat => x + x) x =
                                      x + f (fun _ _ _       => x + y) x.
by move=> x y f E; rewrite {2}[in X in (f X _)]E.
Qed.

Lemma test5 : forall x y f, x = y -> x + f (y + x) x + f (y + x) x =
                                     x + f (x + y) x + f (y + x) x.
by move=> x y f E; rewrite {1}[X in (f X _)]addnC.
Qed.

Lemma test3''' : forall x y f, x = y -> x + f (x + y) x + f (x + y) (x + y) =
                                        x + f (x + y) x + f (y + y) (x + y).
by move=> x y f E; rewrite {1}[in X in (f X X)]E.
Qed.

Lemma test3'''' : forall x y f, x = y -> x + f (x + y) x + f (x + y) (x + y) =
                                         x + f (x + y) x + f (y + y) (y + y).
by move=> x y f E; rewrite [in X in (f X X)]E.
Qed.

Lemma test3x : forall x y f, y+y = x+y -> x + f (x + y) x + f (x + y) (x + y) =
                                         x + f (x + y) x + f (y + y) (y + y).
by move=> x y f E; rewrite -[X in (f X X)]E.
Qed.

Lemma test6 : forall x y (f : nat -> nat), f (x + y).+1 = f (y.+1 + x).
by move=> x y f; rewrite [(x + y) in X in (f X)]addnC.
Qed.

Lemma test7 : forall x y (f : nat -> nat), f (x + y).+1 = f (y + x.+1).
by move=> x y f; rewrite [(x.+1 + y) as X in (f X)]addnC.
Qed.

Lemma manual x y z (f : nat -> nat -> nat) : (x + y).+1 + f (x.+1 + y) (z + (x + y).+1) = 0.
Proof.
rewrite [in f _]addSn.
match goal with |- (x + y).+1 + f (x + y).+1 (z + (x + y).+1) = 0 => idtac end.
rewrite -[X in _ = X]addn0.
match goal with |- (x + y).+1 + f (x + y).+1 (z + (x + y).+1) = 0 + 0 => idtac end.
rewrite -{2}[in X in _ = X](addn0 0).
match goal with |- (x + y).+1 + f (x + y).+1 (z + (x + y).+1) = 0 + (0 + 0) => idtac end.
rewrite [_.+1 in X in f _ X](addnC x.+1).
match goal with |- (x + y).+1 + f (x + y).+1 (z + (y + x.+1)) = 0 + (0 + 0) => idtac end.
rewrite [x.+1 + y as X in f X _]addnC.
match goal with |- (x + y).+1 + f (y + x.+1) (z + (y + x.+1)) = 0 + (0 + 0) => idtac end.
Admitted.

Goal (exists x : 'I_3, x > 0).
apply: (ex_intro _ (@Ordinal _ 2 _)).
Admitted.

Goal (forall y, 1 < y < 2 -> exists x : 'I_3, x > 0).
move=> y; case/andP=> y_gt1 y_lt2; apply: (ex_intro _ (@Ordinal _ y _)).
by apply: leq_trans y_lt2 _.
by move=> y_lt3; apply: leq_trans _ y_gt1.
Qed.

Goal (forall x y : nat, forall P : nat -> Prop, x = y -> True).
move=> x y P E.
have: P x -> P y by suff: x = y by move=> ?; congr (P _).
Admitted.

Goal forall a : bool, a -> true && a || false && a.
by move=> a ?; rewrite [true && _]/= [_ && a]/= orbC [_ || _]//=.
Qed.

Goal forall a : bool, a -> true && a || false && a.
by move=> a ?; rewrite [X in X || _]/= [X in _ || X]/= orbC [false && a as X in X || _]//=.
Qed.

Parameter a : bool.
Definition f x := x || a.
Definition g x := f x.

Goal a -> g false.
by move=> Ha; rewrite [g _]/f orbC Ha.
Qed.

Goal a -> g false || g false.
move=> Ha; rewrite {2}[g _]/f orbC Ha.
match goal with |- (is_true (false || true || g false)) => done end.
Qed.

Goal a -> (a && a || true && a) && true.
by move=> Ha; rewrite -[_ || _]/(g _) andbC /= Ha [g _]/f.
Qed.

Goal a -> (a || a) && true.
by move=> Ha; rewrite -[in _ || _]/(f _) Ha andbC /f.
Qed.

quality98%

¤ Dauer der Verarbeitung: 0.11 Sekunden (vorverarbeitet) ¤

Wurzel

Suchen

Beweissystem der NASA

Beweissystem Isabelle

NIST Cobol Testsuite

Cephes Mathematical Library

Wiener Entwicklungsmethode

Haftungshinweis

Die Informationen auf dieser Webseite wurden nach bestem Wissen sorgfältig zusammengestellt. Es wird jedoch weder Vollständigkeit, noch Richtigkeit, noch Qualität der bereit gestellten Informationen zugesichert.

Bemerkung:

Die farbliche Syntaxdarstellung ist noch experimentell.