(* Checking that unrelated terms requiring some scope do not affect the interpretation of tactic-in-term. The "Check" was failing with: The term "Set" has type "Type" while it is expected to have type
"nat". *)
Notation bar2 a b := (let __ := ltac:(exact I) in (a + b)%type) (only parsing). Check bar2 (Set + Set) Set.
(* Taking into account scopes in notations containing tactic-in-term *)
DeclareScope foo_scope. DelimitScope foo_scope with foo. Notation"x ~~" := (x) (at level 0, only parsing) : foo_scope. Notation bar x := (x%foo) (only parsing). Notation baz x := ltac:(exact x%foo) (only parsing). Check bar (O ~~). Check baz (O ~~). (* Was failing *)
(* This was reported as bug #8706 *)
DeclareScope my_scope. Notation"@ a" := a%nat (at level 100, only parsing) : my_scope. DelimitScope my_scope with my.
Notation"& b" := ltac:(exact (b)%my) (at level 100, only parsing): my_scope. Definition test := (& (@4))%my.
(* Check inconsistent scopes *) Set Warnings "+inconsistent-scopes".
Fail Notation bar3 a := (let __ := ltac:(exact a%nat) in a%bool) (only parsing).
Die Informationen auf dieser Webseite wurden
nach bestem Wissen sorgfältig zusammengestellt. Es wird jedoch weder Vollständigkeit, noch Richtigkeit,
noch Qualität der bereit gestellten Informationen zugesichert.
Bemerkung:
Die farbliche Syntaxdarstellung ist noch experimentell.