(* Author: Sébastien Gouëzel sebastien.gouezel@univ-rennes1.fr Author: Johannes Hölzl (TUM) -- ported to Limsup License: BSD
*)
theory Essential_Supremum imports"HOL-Analysis.Analysis" begin
lemma ae_filter_eq_bot_iff: "ae_filter M = bot \ emeasure M (space M) = 0" by (simp add: AE_iff_measurable trivial_limit_def)
section \<open>The essential supremum\<close>
text\<open>In this paragraph, we define the essential supremum and give its basic properties. The
essential supremum of a functionis its maximum valueif one is allowed to throw away a set
of measure $0$. It is convenient to define it to be infinity for non-measurable functions, as
it allows for neater statements in general. This is a prerequisiste to define the space $L^\infty$.\<close>
definition esssup::"'a measure \ ('a \ 'b::{second_countable_topology, dense_linorder, linorder_topology, complete_linorder}) \ 'b" where"esssup M f = (if f \ borel_measurable M then Limsup (ae_filter M) f else top)"
lemma esssup_non_measurable: "f \ M \\<^sub>M borel \ esssup M f = top" by (simp add: esssup_def)
lemma esssup_eq_AE: assumes f: "f \ M \\<^sub>M borel" shows "esssup M f = Inf {z. AE x in M. f x \ z}" unfolding esssup_def if_P[OF f] Limsup_def proof (intro antisym INF_greatest Inf_greatest; clarsimp) fix y assume"AE x in M. f x \ y" thenhave"(\x. f x \ y) \ {P. AE x in M. P x}" by simp thenshow"(INF P\{P. AE x in M. P x}. SUP x\Collect P. f x) \ y" by (rule INF_lower2) (auto intro: SUP_least) next fix P assume P: "AE x in M. P x" show"Inf {z. AE x in M. f x \ z} \ (SUP x\Collect P. f x)" proof (rule Inf_lower; clarsimp) show"AE x in M. f x \ (SUP x\Collect P. f x)" using P by (auto elim: eventually_mono simp: SUP_upper) qed qed
lemma esssup_eq: "f \ M \\<^sub>M borel \ esssup M f = Inf {z. emeasure M {x \ space M. f x > z} = 0}" by (auto simp add: esssup_eq_AE not_less[symmetric] AE_iff_measurable[OF _ refl] intro!: arg_cong[where f=Inf])
lemma esssup_zero_measure: "emeasure M {x \ space M. f x > esssup M f} = 0" proof (cases "esssup M f = top") case True thenshow ?thesis by auto next case False thenhave f[measurable]: "f \ M \\<^sub>M borel" unfolding esssup_def by meson have"esssup M f < top"using False by (auto simp: less_top) have *: "{x \ space M. f x > z} \ null_sets M" if "z > esssup M f" for z proof - have"\w. w < z \ emeasure M {x \ space M. f x > w} = 0" using\<open>z > esssup M f\<close> f by (auto simp: esssup_eq Inf_less_iff) thenobtain w where"w < z""emeasure M {x \ space M. f x > w} = 0" by auto thenhave a: "{x \ space M. f x > w} \ null_sets M" by auto have b: "{x \ space M. f x > z} \ {x \ space M. f x > w}" using \w < z\ by auto show ?thesis using null_sets_subset[OF a _ b] by simp qed obtain u::"nat \ 'b" where u: "\n. u n > esssup M f" "u \ esssup M f" using approx_from_above_dense_linorder[OF \<open>esssup M f < top\<close>] by auto have"{x \ space M. f x > esssup M f} = (\n. {x \ space M. f x > u n})" using u apply auto apply (metis (mono_tags, lifting) order_tendsto_iff eventually_mono LIMSEQ_unique) using less_imp_le less_le_trans by blast alsohave"... \ null_sets M" using *[OF u(1)] by auto finallyshow ?thesis by auto qed
lemma esssup_AE: "AE x in M. f x \ esssup M f" proof (cases "f \ M \\<^sub>M borel") case True thenshow ?thesis by (intro AE_I[OF _ esssup_zero_measure[of _ f]]) auto qed (simp add: esssup_non_measurable)
lemma esssup_pos_measure: "f \ borel_measurable M \ z < esssup M f \ emeasure M {x \ space M. f x > z} > 0" using Inf_less_iff mem_Collect_eq not_gr_zero by (force simp: esssup_eq)
lemma esssup_I [intro]: "f \ borel_measurable M \ AE x in M. f x \ c \ esssup M f \ c" unfolding esssup_def by (simp add: Limsup_bounded)
lemma esssup_AE_mono: "f \ borel_measurable M \ AE x in M. f x \ g x \ esssup M f \ esssup M g" by (auto simp: esssup_def Limsup_mono)
lemma esssup_mono: "f \ borel_measurable M \ (\x. f x \ g x) \ esssup M f \ esssup M g" by (rule esssup_AE_mono) auto
lemma esssup_AE_cong: "f \ borel_measurable M \ g \ borel_measurable M \ AE x in M. f x = g x \ esssup M f = esssup M g" by (auto simp: esssup_def intro!: Limsup_eq)
lemma esssup_const: "emeasure M (space M) \ 0 \ esssup M (\x. c) = c" by (simp add: esssup_def Limsup_const ae_filter_eq_bot_iff)
lemma esssup_cmult: assumes"c > (0::real)"shows"esssup M (\x. c * f x::ereal) = c * esssup M f" proof - have"(\x. ereal c * f x) \ M \\<^sub>M borel \ f \ M \\<^sub>M borel" proof (subst measurable_cong) fix\<omega> show "f \<omega> = ereal (1/c) * (ereal c * f \<omega>)" using\<open>0 < c\<close> by (cases "f \<omega>") auto qed auto thenhave"(\x. ereal c * f x) \ M \\<^sub>M borel \ f \ M \\<^sub>M borel" by(safe intro!: borel_measurable_ereal_times borel_measurable_const) with\<open>0<c\<close> show ?thesis by (cases "ae_filter M = bot")
(auto simp: esssup_def bot_ereal_def top_ereal_def Limsup_ereal_mult_left) qed
lemma esssup_add: "esssup M (\x. f x + g x::ereal) \ esssup M f + esssup M g" proof (cases "f \ borel_measurable M \ g \ borel_measurable M") case True thenhave [measurable]: "(\x. f x + g x) \ borel_measurable M" by auto have"f x + g x \ esssup M f + esssup M g" if "f x \ esssup M f" "g x \ esssup M g" for x using that add_mono by auto thenhave"AE x in M. f x + g x \ esssup M f + esssup M g" using esssup_AE[of f M] esssup_AE[of g M] by auto thenshow ?thesis using esssup_I by auto next case False thenhave"esssup M f + esssup M g = \" unfolding esssup_def top_ereal_def by auto thenshow ?thesis by auto qed
lemma esssup_zero_space: "emeasure M (space M) = 0 \ f \ borel_measurable M \ esssup M f = (- \::ereal)" by (simp add: esssup_def ae_filter_eq_bot_iff[symmetric] bot_ereal_def)
end
¤ Dauer der Verarbeitung: 0.15 Sekunden
(vorverarbeitet)
¤
Die Informationen auf dieser Webseite wurden
nach bestem Wissen sorgfältig zusammengestellt. Es wird jedoch weder Vollständigkeit, noch Richtigkeit,
noch Qualität der bereit gestellten Informationen zugesichert.
Bemerkung:
Die farbliche Syntaxdarstellung ist noch experimentell.