text‹We define the RSA-PSS signature and verification operations. Moreover we
show, that messages signed with RSA-PSS can always be verified ›
definition rsapss_sign_help1:: "nat ==> nat ==> nat ==> bv" where"rsapss_sign_help1 em_nat e n = nat_to_bv_length (rsa_crypt em_nat e n) (length (nat_to_bv n))"
definition rsapss_sign:: "bv ==> nat ==> nat ==> bv"(* Input: message (an bv), private key, RSA modulus; Output: signature (an bv)*) where"rsapss_sign m e n = (if (emsapss_encode m (length (nat_to_bv n) - 1)) = [] then [] else (rsapss_sign_help1 (bv_to_nat (emsapss_encode m (length (nat_to_bv n) - 1)) ) e n))"
definition rsapss_verify:: "bv ==> bv ==> nat ==> nat ==> bool"(* Input: Message, Signature to be verified (an bv), public key, RSA modulus; Output: valid or invalid signature *) where"rsapss_verify m s d n = (if (length s) ≠ length(nat_to_bv n) then False else let em = nat_to_bv_length (rsa_crypt (bv_to_nat s) d n) ((roundup (length(nat_to_bv n) - 1) 8) * 8) in emsapss_decode m em (length(nat_to_bv n) - 1))"
lemma bv_to_nat_emsapss_encode_le: "emsapss_encode m x ≠ [] ==> bv_to_nat (emsapss_encode m x) < 2^(roundup x 8 * 8)" apply (insert length_emsapss_encode [of m x]) apply (insert bv_to_nat_upper_range [of "emsapss_encode m x"]) by (simp)
lemma length_helper1: shows"length (bvxor (generate_DB (generate_PS (length (nat_to_bv (p * q)) - Suc 0) (length (sha1 (generate_M' (sha1 m) salt))))) (MGF (sha1 (generate_M' (sha1 m) salt)) (length (generate_DB (generate_PS (length (nat_to_bv (p * q)) - Suc 0) (length (sha1 (generate_M' (sha1 m) salt)))))))@ sha1 (generate_M' (sha1 m) salt) @ BC) = length (bvxor (generate_DB (generate_PS (length (nat_to_bv (p * q)) - Suc 0) (length (sha1 (generate_M' (sha1 m) salt))))) (MGF (sha1 (generate_M' (sha1 m) salt)) (length (generate_DB (generate_PS (length (nat_to_bv (p * q)) - Suc 0) (length (sha1 (generate_M' (sha1 m) salt)))))))) + 168" proof - have a: "length BC = 8"by (simp add: BC_def) have b: "length (sha1 (generate_M' (sha1 m) salt)) = 160"by (simp add: sha1len) have c: "∧ a b c. length (a@b@c) = length a + length b + length c"by simp from a and b show ?thesis using c by simp qed
lemma MGFLen_helper: "MGF z l ~= [] ==> l <= 2^32*(length (sha1 z))" proof (cases "2^32*length (sha1 z) < l") assume x: "MGF z l ~= []" assume a: "2 ^ 32 * length (sha1 z) < l" thenhave"MGF z l = []" proof (cases "l=0") assume"l=0" thenshow"MGF z l = []"by (simp add: MGF_def) next assume"l~=0" thenhave"(l = 0 ∨ 2^32*length(sha1 z) < l) = True"using a by fast thenshow"MGF z l = []"apply (simp only: MGF_def) by simp qed thenshow ?thesis using x by simp next assume"¬ 2 ^ 32 * length (sha1 z) < l" thenshow ?thesis by simp qed
lemma length_helper2: assumes p: "prime p"and q: "prime q" and mgf: "(MGF (sha1 (generate_M' (sha1 m) salt)) (length (generate_DB (generate_PS (length (nat_to_bv (p * q)) - Suc 0) (length (sha1 (generate_M' (sha1 m) salt))))))) ~= []" and len: "length (sha1 M) + sLen + 16 ≤ (length (nat_to_bv (p * q))) - Suc 0" shows"length ( (bvxor (generate_DB (generate_PS (length (nat_to_bv (p * q)) - Suc 0) (length (sha1 (generate_M' (sha1 m) salt))))) (MGF (sha1 (generate_M' (sha1 m) salt)) (length (generate_DB (generate_PS (length (nat_to_bv (p * q)) - Suc 0) (length (sha1 (generate_M' (sha1 m) salt)))))))) ) = (roundup (length (nat_to_bv (p * q)) - Suc 0) 8) * 8 - 168" proof - have a: "length (MGF (sha1 (generate_M' (sha1 m) salt)) (length (generate_DB (generate_PS (length (nat_to_bv (p * q)) - Suc 0) (length (sha1 (generate_M' (sha1 m) salt))))))) = (length (generate_DB (generate_PS (length (nat_to_bv (p * q)) - Suc 0) (length (sha1 (generate_M' (sha1 m) salt))))))" proof - have"0 < (length (generate_DB (generate_PS (length (nat_to_bv (p * q)) - Suc 0) (length (sha1 (generate_M' (sha1 m) salt))))))"by (simp add: generate_DB_def) moreoverhave"(length (generate_DB (generate_PS (length (nat_to_bv (p * q)) - Suc 0) (length (sha1 (generate_M' (sha1 m) salt)))))) ≤ 2^32 * length (sha1 (sha1 (generate_M' (sha1 m) salt)))"using mgf and MGFLen_helper by simp ultimatelyshow ?thesis using length_MGF by simp qed have b: "length (generate_DB (generate_PS (length (nat_to_bv (p * q)) - Suc 0) (length (sha1 (generate_M' (sha1 m) salt))))) = ((roundup ((length (nat_to_bv (p * q))) - Suc 0) 8) * 8 - 168)" proof - have"0 <= (length (nat_to_bv (p * q))) - Suc 0" proof - from p have p2: "1<p"by (simp add: prime_nat_iff) moreoverfrom q have"1<q"by (simp add: prime_nat_iff) ultimatelyhave"p<p*q"by simp thenhave"1<p*q"using p2 by arith thenshow ?thesis using len_nat_to_bv_pos by simp qed thenshow ?thesis using solve_length_generate_DB using len by simp qed have c: "length (bvxor (generate_DB (generate_PS (length (nat_to_bv (p * q)) - Suc 0) (length (sha1 (generate_M' (sha1 m) salt))))) (MGF (sha1 (generate_M' (sha1 m) salt)) (length (generate_DB (generate_PS (length (nat_to_bv (p * q)) - Suc 0) (length (sha1 (generate_M' (sha1 m) salt)))))))) = roundup (length (nat_to_bv (p * q)) - Suc 0) 8 * 8 - 168"using a and b and length_bvxor by simp thenshow ?thesis by simp qed
lemma emBits_roundup_cancel: "emBits mod 8 ~= 0 ==> (roundup emBits 8)*8 - emBits = 8-(emBits mod 8)" apply (auto simp add: roundup) by (arith)
lemma emBits_roundup_cancel2: "emBits mod 8 ~=0 ==> (roundup emBits 8) * 8 - (8-(emBits mod 8)) = emBits" by (auto simp add: roundup)
lemma length_bound: "[emBits mod 8 ~=0; 8 <= (length maskedDB)]==> length (remzero ((maskedDB_zero maskedDB emBits)@a@b)) <= length (maskedDB@a@b) - (8-(emBits mod 8))" proof - assume a: "emBits mod 8 ~=0" assume len: "8 <= (length maskedDB)" have b:" ∧ a. length (remzero a) <= length a" proof - fix a show"length (remzero a) <= length a" proof (induct a) show"(length (remzero [])) <= length []"by (simp) next case (Cons hd tl) show"(length (remzero (hd#tl))) <= length (hd#tl)" proof (cases hd) assume"hd=0" thenhave"remzero (hd#tl) = remzero tl"by simp thenshow ?thesis using Cons by simp next assume"hd=1" thenhave"remzero (hd#tl) = hd#tl"by simp thenshow ?thesis by simp qed qed qed from len show"length (remzero (maskedDB_zero maskedDB emBits @ a @ b)) ≤ length (maskedDB @ a @ b) - (8 - emBits mod 8)" proof - have"remzero(bv_prepend ((roundup emBits 8) * 8 - emBits) 0 (drop ((roundup emBits 8)*8 - emBits) maskedDB)@a@b) = remzero ((drop ((roundup emBits 8)*8 -emBits) maskedDB)@a@b)"using remzero_replicate by (simp add: bv_prepend) moreoverfrom emBits_roundup_cancel have"roundup emBits 8 * 8 - emBits = 8 - emBits mod 8"using a by simp moreoverhave"length ((drop (8-emBits mod 8) maskedDB)@a@b) = length (maskedDB@a@b) - (8-emBits mod 8)" proof - show ?thesis using length_drop[of "(8-emBits mod 8)" maskedDB] proof (simp) have"0 <= emBits mod 8"by simp thenhave"8-(emBits mod 8) <= 8"by simp thenshow"length maskedDB + emBits mod 8 - 8 + (length a + length b) = length maskedDB + (length a + length b) + emBits mod 8 - 8"using len by arith qed qed ultimatelyshow ?thesis using b[of "(drop ((roundup emBits 8)*8 - emBits) maskedDB)@a@b"] by (simp add: maskedDB_zero_def) qed qed
Die Informationen auf dieser Webseite wurden
nach bestem Wissen sorgfältig zusammengestellt. Es wird jedoch weder Vollständigkeit, noch Richtigkeit,
noch Qualität der bereit gestellten Informationen zugesichert.
Bemerkung:
Die farbliche Syntaxdarstellung und die Messung sind noch experimentell.