theory While_Combinator_Example imports"HOL-Library.While_Combinator" begin
text‹Computation of the 🍋‹lfp›on finite sets via iteration.›
theorem lfp_conv_while: "[| mono f; finite U; f U = U |] ==> lfp f = fst (while (λ(A, fA). A ≠ fA) (λ(A, fA). (fA, f fA)) ({}, f {}))" apply (rule_tac P = "λ(A, B). (A ⊆ U ∧ B = f A ∧ A ⊆ B ∧ B ⊆ lfp f)"and
r = "((Pow U × UNIV) × (Pow U × UNIV)) ∩ inv_image finite_psubset ((-) U o fst)"in while_rule) apply (subst lfp_unfold) apply assumption apply (simp add: monoD) apply (subst lfp_unfold) apply assumption apply clarsimp apply (blast dest: monoD) apply (fastforce intro!: lfp_lowerbound) apply (blast intro: wf_finite_psubset Int_lower2 [THEN [2] wf_subset]) apply (clarsimp simp add: finite_psubset_def order_less_le) apply (blast dest: monoD) done
subsection‹Example›
text‹Cannot use @{thm[source]set_eq_subset} because it leads to looping because the antisymmetry simproc turns the subset relationship back into equality.›
theorem"P (lfp (λN::int set. {0} ∪ {(n + 2) mod 6 | n. n ∈ N})) = P {0, 4, 2}" proof - have seteq: "∧A B. (A = B) = ((∀a ∈ A. a∈B) ∧ (∀b∈B. b∈A))" by blast have aux: "∧f A B. {f n | n. A n ∨ B n} = {f n | n. A n} ∪ {f n | n. B n}" apply blast done show ?thesis apply (subst lfp_conv_while [where ?U = "{0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5}"]) apply (rule monoI) apply blast apply simp apply (simp add: aux set_eq_subset) txt‹The fixpoint computation is performed purely by rewriting:› apply (simp add: while_unfold aux seteq del: subset_empty) done qed
end
Messung V0.5 in Prozent
¤ Dauer der Verarbeitung: 0.1 Sekunden
(vorverarbeitet am 2026-05-01)
¤
Die Informationen auf dieser Webseite wurden
nach bestem Wissen sorgfältig zusammengestellt. Es wird jedoch weder Vollständigkeit, noch Richtigkeit,
noch Qualität der bereit gestellten Informationen zugesichert.
Bemerkung:
Die farbliche Syntaxdarstellung und die Messung sind noch experimentell.