(* Title: HOL/UNITY/Comp/Alloc.thy Author: Lawrence C Paulson, Cambridge University Computer Laboratory Copyright 1998 University of Cambridge Specification of Chandy and Charpentier's Allocator *)
theory Alloc imports AllocBase "../PPROD" begin
subsection‹State definitions. OUTPUT variables are locals›
record 'a clientState_d =
clientState +
dummy :: 'a 🍋‹dummy field for new variables›
definition 🍋‹DUPLICATED FROM Client.thy, but with "tok" removed› 🍋‹Maybe want a special theory section to declare such maps›
non_dummy :: "'a clientState_d => clientState" where"non_dummy s = (|giv = giv s, ask = ask s, rel = rel s|)"
definition 🍋‹Renaming map to put a Client into the standard form›
client_map :: "'a clientState_d => clientState*'a" where"client_map = funPair non_dummy dummy"
record allocState =
allocGiv :: "nat => nat list"🍋‹OUTPUT history: source of "giv" for i›
allocAsk :: "nat => nat list"🍋‹INPUT: allocator's copy of "ask" for i›
allocRel :: "nat => nat list"🍋‹INPUT: allocator's copy of "rel" for i›
record 'a allocState_d =
allocState +
dummy :: 'a 🍋‹dummy field for new variables›
record 'a systemState =
allocState +
client :: "nat => clientState"🍋‹states of all clients›
dummy :: 'a 🍋‹dummy field for new variables›
subsubsection ‹Resource allocation system specification›
definition 🍋‹spec (1)›
system_safety :: "'a systemState program set" where"system_safety = Always {s. (∑i ∈ lessThan Nclients. (tokens o giv o sub i o client)s) ≤ NbT + (∑i ∈ lessThan Nclients. (tokens o rel o sub i o client)s)}"
definition 🍋‹spec (2)›
system_progress :: "'a systemState program set" where"system_progress = (INT i : lessThan Nclients. INT h. {s. h ≤ (ask o sub i o client)s} LeadsTo {s. h pfixLe (giv o sub i o client) s})"
definition
system_spec :: "'a systemState program set" where"system_spec = system_safety Int system_progress"
subsubsection ‹Client specification (required)›
definition 🍋‹spec (3)›
client_increasing :: "'a clientState_d program set" where"client_increasing = UNIV guarantees Increasing ask Int Increasing rel"
definition 🍋‹spec (5)›
client_progress :: "'a clientState_d program set" where"client_progress = Increasing giv guarantees (INT h. {s. h ≤ giv s & h pfixGe ask s} LeadsTo {s. tokens h ≤ (tokens o rel) s})"
definition 🍋‹spec: preserves part›
client_preserves :: "'a clientState_d program set" where"client_preserves = preserves giv Int preserves clientState_d.dummy"
definition 🍋‹environmental constraints›
client_allowed_acts :: "'a clientState_d program set" where"client_allowed_acts = {F. AllowedActs F = insert Id (∪ (Acts ` preserves (funPair rel ask)))}"
definition
client_spec :: "'a clientState_d program set" where"client_spec = client_increasing Int client_bounded Int client_progress Int client_allowed_acts Int client_preserves"
definition 🍋‹spec (6)›
alloc_increasing :: "'a allocState_d program set" where"alloc_increasing = UNIV guarantees (INT i : lessThan Nclients. Increasing (sub i o allocGiv))"
definition 🍋‹spec (7)›
alloc_safety :: "'a allocState_d program set" where"alloc_safety = (INT i : lessThan Nclients. Increasing (sub i o allocRel)) guarantees Always {s. (∑i ∈ lessThan Nclients. (tokens o sub i o allocGiv)s) ≤ NbT + (∑i ∈ lessThan Nclients. (tokens o sub i o allocRel)s)}"
definition 🍋‹spec (8)›
alloc_progress :: "'a allocState_d program set" where"alloc_progress = (INT i : lessThan Nclients. Increasing (sub i o allocAsk) Int Increasing (sub i o allocRel)) Int Always {s. ∀i ∀elt ∈ set ((sub i o allocAsk) s). elt ≤ NbT} Int (INT i : lessThan Nclients. INT h. {s. h ≤ (sub i o allocGiv)s & h pfixGe (sub i o allocAsk)s} LeadsTo {s. tokens h ≤ (tokens o sub i o allocRel)s}) guarantees (INT i : lessThan Nclients. INT h. {s. h ≤ (sub i o allocAsk) s} LeadsTo {s. h pfixLe (sub i o allocGiv) s})"
(*NOTE: to follow the original paper, the formula above should have had INT h. {s. h i ≤ (sub i o allocGiv)s & h i pfixGe (sub i o allocAsk)s} LeadsTo {s. tokens h i ≤ (tokens o sub i o allocRel)s}) thus h should have been a function variable. However, only h i is ever looked at.*)
definition 🍋‹spec: preserves part›
alloc_preserves :: "'a allocState_d program set" where"alloc_preserves = preserves allocRel Int preserves allocAsk Int preserves allocState_d.dummy"
definition 🍋‹environmental constraints›
alloc_allowed_acts :: "'a allocState_d program set" where"alloc_allowed_acts = {F. AllowedActs F = insert Id (∪(Acts ` (preserves allocGiv)))}"
definition
alloc_spec :: "'a allocState_d program set" where"alloc_spec = alloc_increasing Int alloc_safety Int alloc_progress Int alloc_allowed_acts Int alloc_preserves"
subsubsection ‹Network specification›
definition 🍋‹spec (9.1)›
network_ask :: "'a systemState program set" where"network_ask = (INT i : lessThan Nclients. Increasing (ask o sub i o client) guarantees ((sub i o allocAsk) Fols (ask o sub i o client)))"
definition 🍋‹spec (9.2)›
network_giv :: "'a systemState program set" where"network_giv = (INT i : lessThan Nclients. Increasing (sub i o allocGiv) guarantees ((giv o sub i o client) Fols (sub i o allocGiv)))"
definition 🍋‹spec (9.3)›
network_rel :: "'a systemState program set" where"network_rel = (INT i : lessThan Nclients. Increasing (rel o sub i o client) guarantees ((sub i o allocRel) Fols (rel o sub i o client)))"
definition 🍋‹spec: preserves part›
network_preserves :: "'a systemState program set" where"network_preserves = preserves allocGiv Int (INT i : lessThan Nclients. preserves (rel o sub i o client) Int preserves (ask o sub i o client))"
definition 🍋‹environmental constraints›
network_allowed_acts :: "'a systemState program set" where"network_allowed_acts = {F. AllowedActs F = insert Id (∪ (Acts ` (preserves allocRel ∩ (∩i preserves (giv ∘ sub i ∘ client)))))}"
definition
network_spec :: "'a systemState program set" where"network_spec = network_ask Int network_giv Int network_rel Int network_allowed_acts Int network_preserves"
subsubsection ‹State mappings›
definition
sysOfAlloc :: "((nat => clientState) * 'a) allocState_d => 'a systemState" where"sysOfAlloc = (%s. let (cl,xtr) = allocState_d.dummy s in (| allocGiv = allocGiv s, allocAsk = allocAsk s, allocRel = allocRel s, client = cl, dummy = xtr|))"
ML ‹ML_Thms.bind_thms ("allocRel_o_inv_sysOfAlloc_eq'", make_o_equivs 🍋 @{thm allocRel_o_inv_sysOfAlloc_eq})› declare allocRel_o_inv_sysOfAlloc_eq' [simp]
lemma rel_inv_client_map_drop_map: "(rel o inv client_map o drop_map i o inv sysOfClient) = rel o sub i o client" apply (simp add: o_def drop_map_def) done
ML ‹ML_Thms.bind_thms ("rel_inv_client_map_drop_map'", make_o_equivs 🍋 @{thm rel_inv_client_map_drop_map})› declare rel_inv_client_map_drop_map [simp]
lemma ask_inv_client_map_drop_map: "(ask o inv client_map o drop_map i o inv sysOfClient) = ask o sub i o client" apply (simp add: o_def drop_map_def) done
ML ‹ML_Thms.bind_thms ("ask_inv_client_map_drop_map'", make_o_equivs 🍋 @{thm ask_inv_client_map_drop_map})› declare ask_inv_client_map_drop_map [simp]
text‹* These preservation laws should be generated automatically *›
lemma Client_Allowed [simp]: "Allowed Client = preserves rel Int preserves ask" by (auto simp add: Allowed_def Client_AllowedActs safety_prop_Acts_iff)
lemma Network_Allowed [simp]: "Allowed Network = preserves allocRel Int (INT i: lessThan Nclients. preserves(giv o sub i o client))" by (auto simp add: Allowed_def Network_AllowedActs safety_prop_Acts_iff)
lemma fst_o_lift_map' [simp]: "(f ∘ sub i ∘ fst ∘ lift_map i ∘ g) = f o fst o g" apply (subst fst_o_lift_map [symmetric]) apply (simp only: o_assoc) done
(*The proofs of rename_Client_Increasing, rename_Client_Bounded and rename_Client_Progress are similar. All require copying out the original Client property. A forward proof can be constructed as follows: Client_Increasing_ask RS (bij_client_map RS rename_rename_guarantees_eq RS iffD2) RS (lift_lift_guarantees_eq RS iffD2) RS guarantees_PLam_I RS (bij_sysOfClient RS rename_rename_guarantees_eq RS iffD2) |> simplify (simpset() addsimps [lift_image_eq_rename, o_def, split_def, surj_rename]) However, the "preserves" property remains to be discharged, and the unfolding of "o" and "sub" complicates subsequent reasoning. The following tactic works for all three proofs, though it certainly looks ad-hoc! *)
ML ‹ fun rename_client_map_tac ctxt = EVERY [ simp_tac (ctxt addsimps [@{thm rename_guarantees_eq_rename_inv}]) 1, resolve_tac ctxt @{thms guarantees_PLam_I} 1, assume_tac ctxt 2, (*preserves: routine reasoning*)
asm_simp_tac (ctxt addsimps [@{thm lift_preserves_sub}]) 2, (*the guarantee for "lift i (rename client_map Client)" *)
asm_simp_tac
(ctxt addsimps [@{thm lift_guarantees_eq_lift_inv},
@{thm rename_guarantees_eq_rename_inv},
@{thm bij_imp_bij_inv}, @{thm surj_rename},
@{thm inv_inv_eq}]) 1,
asm_simp_tac
(ctxt addsimps [@{thm o_def}, @{thm non_dummy_def}, @{thm guarantees_Int_right}]) 1] ›
text‹Lifting ‹Client_Increasing› to 🍋‹systemState›\<close> lemma rename_Client_Increasing: "i ∈ I ==> rename sysOfClient (plam x: I. rename client_map Client) ∈ UNIV guarantees Increasing (ask o sub i o client) Int Increasing (rel o sub i o client)" by rename_client_map
lemma preserves_sub_fst_lift_map: "[| F ∈ preserves w; i ≠ j |] ==> F ∈ preserves (sub i o fst o lift_map j o funPair v w)" apply (auto simp add: lift_map_def split_def linorder_neq_iff o_def) apply (drule_tac [!] subset_preserves_o [THEN [2] rev_subsetD]) apply (auto simp add: o_def) done
lemma client_preserves_giv_oo_client_map: "[| i < Nclients; j < Nclients |] ==> Client ∈ preserves (giv o sub i o fst o lift_map j o client_map)" apply (cases "i=j") apply (simp, simp add: o_def non_dummy_def) apply (drule Client_preserves_dummy [THEN preserves_sub_fst_lift_map]) apply (drule_tac [!] subset_preserves_o [THEN [2] rev_subsetD]) apply (simp add: o_def client_map_def) done
lemma rename_sysOfClient_ok_Network: "rename sysOfClient (plam x: lessThan Nclients. rename client_map Client) ok Network" by (auto simp add: ok_iff_Allowed client_preserves_giv_oo_client_map)
lemma rename_sysOfClient_ok_Alloc: "rename sysOfClient (plam x: lessThan Nclients. rename client_map Client) ok rename sysOfAlloc Alloc" by (simp add: ok_iff_Allowed)
lemma rename_sysOfAlloc_ok_Network: "rename sysOfAlloc Alloc ok Network" by (simp add: ok_iff_Allowed)
text‹The "ok" laws, re-oriented. But not sure this works: theorem ‹ok_commute› i declare
rename_sysOfClient_ok_Network [THEN ok_sym, iff]
rename_sysOfClient_ok_Alloc [THEN ok_sym, iff]
rename_sysOfAlloc_ok_Network [THEN ok_sym]
lemma System_Increasing: "i < Nclients ==> System ∈ Increasing (ask o sub i o client) Int Increasing (rel o sub i o client)" apply (rule component_guaranteesD [OF rename_Client_Increasing Client_component_System]) apply auto done
lemmas rename_guarantees_sysOfAlloc_I =
bij_sysOfAlloc [THEN rename_rename_guarantees_eq, THEN iffD2]
(*Lifting Alloc_Increasing up to the level of systemState*) lemmas rename_Alloc_Increasing =
Alloc_Increasing
[THEN rename_guarantees_sysOfAlloc_I,
simplified surj_rename o_def sub_apply
rename_image_Increasing bij_sysOfAlloc
allocGiv_o_inv_sysOfAlloc_eq']
lemma System_Increasing_allocGiv: "i < Nclients ==> System ∈ Increasing (sub i o allocGiv)" apply (unfold System_def) apply (simp add: o_def) apply (rule rename_Alloc_Increasing [THEN guarantees_Join_I1, THEN guaranteesD]) apply auto done
ML ‹ ML_Thms.bind_thms ("System_Increasing'", list_of_Int @{thm System_Increasing}) ›
declare System_Increasing' [intro!]
text‹Follows consequences. The "Always (INT ...) formulation expresses the general safety property and allows it to be combined using ‹Always_Int_rule› b
lemma System_Follows_rel: "i < Nclients ==> System ∈ ((sub i o allocRel) Fols (rel o sub i o client))" apply (auto intro!: Network_Rel [THEN component_guaranteesD]) apply (simp add: ok_commute [of Network]) done
lemma System_Follows_ask: "i < Nclients ==> System ∈ ((sub i o allocAsk) Fols (ask o sub i o client))" apply (auto intro!: Network_Ask [THEN component_guaranteesD]) apply (simp add: ok_commute [of Network]) done
lemma System_Follows_allocGiv: "i < Nclients ==> System ∈ (giv o sub i o client) Fols (sub i o allocGiv)" apply (auto intro!: Network_Giv [THEN component_guaranteesD]
rename_Alloc_Increasing [THEN component_guaranteesD]) apply (simp_all add: o_def non_dummy_def ok_commute [of Network]) apply (auto intro!: rename_Alloc_Increasing [THEN component_guaranteesD]) done
lemma Always_giv_le_allocGiv: "System ∈ Always (INT i: lessThan Nclients. {s. (giv o sub i o client) s ≤ (sub i o allocGiv) s})" apply auto apply (erule System_Follows_allocGiv [THEN Follows_Bounded]) done
lemma Always_allocAsk_le_ask: "System ∈ Always (INT i: lessThan Nclients. {s. (sub i o allocAsk) s ≤ (ask o sub i o client) s})" apply auto apply (erule System_Follows_ask [THEN Follows_Bounded]) done
lemma Always_allocRel_le_rel: "System ∈ Always (INT i: lessThan Nclients. {s. (sub i o allocRel) s ≤ (rel o sub i o client) s})" by (auto intro!: Follows_Bounded System_Follows_rel)
subsection‹Proof of the safety property (1)›
text‹safety (1), step 1 is ‹System_Follows_rel›\›
text‹safety (1), step 2› (* i < Nclients ==> System : Increasing (sub i o allocRel) *) lemmas System_Increasing_allocRel = System_Follows_rel [THEN Follows_Increasing1]
(*Lifting Alloc_safety up to the level of systemState. Simplifying with o_def gets rid of the translations but it unfortunately gets rid of the other "o"s too.*)
text‹safety (1), step 3› lemma System_sum_bounded: "System ∈ Always {s. (∑i ∈ lessThan Nclients. (tokens o sub i o allocGiv) s) ≤ NbT + (∑i ∈ lessThan Nclients. (tokens o sub i o allocRel) s)}" apply (simp add: o_apply) apply (insert Alloc_Safety [THEN rename_guarantees_sysOfAlloc_I]) apply (simp add: o_def) apply (erule component_guaranteesD) apply (auto simp add: System_Increasing_allocRel [simplified sub_apply o_def]) done
text‹Follows reasoning›
lemma Always_tokens_giv_le_allocGiv: "System ∈ Always (INT i: lessThan Nclients. {s. (tokens o giv o sub i o client) s ≤ (tokens o sub i o allocGiv) s})" apply (rule Always_giv_le_allocGiv [THEN Always_weaken]) apply (auto intro: tokens_mono_prefix simp add: o_apply) done
lemma Always_tokens_allocRel_le_rel: "System ∈ Always (INT i: lessThan Nclients. {s. (tokens o sub i o allocRel) s ≤ (tokens o rel o sub i o client) s})" apply (rule Always_allocRel_le_rel [THEN Always_weaken]) apply (auto intro: tokens_mono_prefix simp add: o_apply) done
text‹progress (2), step 1 is ‹System_Follows_ask›and ‹System_Follows_rel›\›
text‹progress (2), step 2; see also ‹System_Increasing_allocRel›\› (* i < Nclients ==> System : Increasing (sub i o allocAsk) *) lemmas System_Increasing_allocAsk = System_Follows_ask [THEN Follows_Increasing1]
text‹progress (2), step 3: lifting ‹Client_Bounded› to systemState› lemma rename_Client_Bounded: "i ∈ I ==> rename sysOfClient (plam x: I. rename client_map Client) ∈ UNIV guarantees Always {s. ∀elt ∈ set ((ask o sub i o client) s). elt ≤ NbT}" using image_cong_simp [cong del] by rename_client_map
lemma System_Bounded_ask: "i < Nclients ==> System ∈ Always {s. ∀elt ∈ set ((ask o sub i o client) s). elt ≤ NbT}" apply (rule component_guaranteesD [OF rename_Client_Bounded Client_component_System]) apply auto done
lemma Collect_all_imp_eq: "{x. ∀y. P y ⟶ Q x y} = (INT y: {y. P y}. {x. Q x y})" apply blast done
text‹progress (2), step 5 is ‹System_Increasing_allocGiv›\ text‹progress (2), step 6› (* i < Nclients ==> System : Increasing (giv o sub i o client) *) lemmas System_Increasing_giv = System_Follows_allocGiv [THEN Follows_Increasing1]
lemma rename_Client_Progress: "i ∈ I ==> rename sysOfClient (plam x: I. rename client_map Client) ∈ Increasing (giv o sub i o client) guarantees (INT h. {s. h ≤ (giv o sub i o client) s & h pfixGe (ask o sub i o client) s} LeadsTo {s. tokens h ≤ (tokens o rel o sub i o client) s})"
supply image_cong_simp [cong del] apply rename_client_map apply (simp add: Client_Progress [simplified o_def]) done
text‹progress (2), step 7› lemma System_Client_Progress: "System ∈ (INT i : (lessThan Nclients). INT h. {s. h ≤ (giv o sub i o client) s & h pfixGe (ask o sub i o client) s} LeadsTo {s. tokens h ≤ (tokens o rel o sub i o client) s})" apply (rule INT_I) (*Couldn't have just used Auto_tac since the "INT h" must be kept*) apply (rule component_guaranteesD [OF rename_Client_Progress Client_component_System]) apply (auto simp add: System_Increasing_giv) done
(*Concludes System : {s. k ≤ (sub i o allocGiv) s} LeadsTo {s. (sub i o allocAsk) s ≤ (ask o sub i o client) s} Int {s. k \<le> (giv o sub i o client) s} *)
lemma System_lemma3: "i < Nclients ==> System ∈ {s. h ≤ (sub i o allocGiv) s & h pfixGe (sub i o allocAsk) s} LeadsTo {s. h ≤ (giv o sub i o client) s & h pfixGe (ask o sub i o client) s}" apply (rule single_LeadsTo_I) apply (rule_tac k1 = h and x1 = "(sub i o allocAsk) s" in System_lemma2 [THEN LeadsTo_weaken]) apply auto apply (blast intro: trans_Ge [THEN trans_genPrefix, THEN transD] prefix_imp_pfixGe) done
text‹progress (2), step 8: Client i's "release" action is visible system-wide› lemma System_Alloc_Client_Progress: "i < Nclients ==> System ∈ {s. h ≤ (sub i o allocGiv) s & h pfixGe (sub i o allocAsk) s} LeadsTo {s. tokens h ≤ (tokens o sub i o allocRel) s}" apply (rule LeadsTo_Trans) prefer 2 apply (drule System_Follows_rel [THEN
mono_tokens [THEN mono_Follows_o, THEN [2] rev_subsetD], THEN Follows_LeadsTo]) apply (simp add: o_assoc) apply (rule LeadsTo_Trans) apply (cut_tac [2] System_Client_Progress) prefer 2 apply (blast intro: LeadsTo_Basis) apply (erule System_lemma3) done
text‹Lifting ‹Alloc_Progress›up to the level of systemState›
text‹progress (2), step 9› lemma System_Alloc_Progress: "System ∈ (INT i : (lessThan Nclients). INT h. {s. h ≤ (sub i o allocAsk) s} LeadsTo {s. h pfixLe (sub i o allocGiv) s})" apply (simp only: o_apply sub_def) apply (insert Alloc_Progress [THEN rename_guarantees_sysOfAlloc_I]) apply (simp add: o_def del: INT_iff) apply (drule component_guaranteesD) apply (auto simp add:
System_Increasing_allocRel [simplified sub_apply o_def]
System_Increasing_allocAsk [simplified sub_apply o_def]
System_Bounded_allocAsk [simplified sub_apply o_def]
System_Alloc_Client_Progress [simplified sub_apply o_def]) done
Die Informationen auf dieser Webseite wurden
nach bestem Wissen sorgfältig zusammengestellt. Es wird jedoch weder Vollständigkeit, noch Richtigkeit,
noch Qualität der bereit gestellten Informationen zugesichert.
Bemerkung:
Die farbliche Syntaxdarstellung und die Messung sind noch experimentell.