(* Title: HOL/Auth/Guard/GuardK.thy
Author: Frederic Blanqui, University of Cambridge Computer Laboratory
Copyright 2002 University of Cambridge
Very similar to Guard except:
- Guard is replaced by GuardK, guard by guardK, Nonce by Key
- some scripts are slightly modified (+ keyset_in, kparts_parts)
- the hypothesis Key n ~:G (keyset G) is added
*)
section‹protocol-independent confidentiality
theorem on keys
›
theory GuardK
imports Analz Extensions
begin
(******************************************************************************
messages where all the occurrences of Key n are
in a sub-message of the form Crypt (invKey K) X with K:Ks
******************************************************************************)
inductive_set
guardK ::
"nat => key set => msg set"
for n :: nat
and Ks ::
"key set"
where
No_Key [intro]:
"Key n \ parts {X} \ X \ guardK n Ks"
| Guard_Key [intro]:
"invKey K \ Ks \ Crypt K X \ guardK n Ks"
| Crypt [intro]:
"X \ guardK n Ks \ Crypt K X \ guardK n Ks"
| Pair [intro]:
"\X \ guardK n Ks; Y \ guardK n Ks\ \ \X,Y\ \ guardK n Ks"
subsection‹basic facts about
🍋‹guardK
››
lemma Nonce_is_guardK [iff]:
"Nonce p \ guardK n Ks"
by auto
lemma Agent_is_guardK [iff]:
"Agent A \ guardK n Ks"
by auto
lemma Number_is_guardK [iff]:
"Number r \ guardK n Ks"
by auto
lemma Key_notin_guardK:
"X \ guardK n Ks \ X \ Key n"
by (erule guardK.induct, auto)
lemma Key_notin_guardK_iff [iff]:
"Key n \ guardK n Ks"
by (auto dest: Key_notin_guardK)
lemma guardK_has_Crypt [rule_format]:
"X \ guardK n Ks \ Key n \ parts {X}
⟶ (
∃K Y. Crypt K Y
∈ kparts {X}
∧ Key n
∈ parts {Y})
"
by (erule guardK.induct, auto)
lemma Key_notin_kparts_msg:
"X \ guardK n Ks \ Key n \ kparts {X}"
by (erule guardK.induct, auto dest: kparts_parts)
lemma Key_in_kparts_imp_no_guardK:
"Key n \ kparts H
==> ∃X. X
∈ H
∧ X
∉ guardK n Ks
"
apply (drule in_kparts, clarify)
apply (rule_tac x=X
in exI, clarify)
by (auto dest: Key_notin_kparts_msg)
lemma guardK_kparts [rule_format]:
"X \ guardK n Ks \
Y
∈ kparts {X}
⟶ Y
∈ guardK n Ks
"
by (erule guardK.induct, auto dest: kparts_parts parts_sub)
lemma guardK_Crypt:
"\Crypt K Y \ guardK n Ks; K \ invKey`Ks\ \ Y \ guardK n Ks"
by (ind_cases
"Crypt K Y \ guardK n Ks") (auto intro!: image_eqI)
lemma guardK_MPair [iff]:
"(\X,Y\ \ guardK n Ks)
= (X
∈ guardK n Ks
∧ Y
∈ guardK n Ks)
"
by (auto, (ind_cases
"\X,Y\ \ guardK n Ks", auto)+)
lemma guardK_not_guardK [rule_format]:
"X \guardK n Ks \
Crypt K Y
∈ kparts {X}
⟶ Key n
∈ kparts {Y}
⟶ Y
∉ guardK n Ks
"
by (erule guardK.induct, auto dest: guardK_kparts)
lemma guardK_extand:
"\X \ guardK n Ks; Ks \ Ks';
[K
∈ Ks
'; K \ Ks\ \ Key K \ parts {X}\ \ X \ guardK n Ks'"
by (erule guardK.induct, auto)
subsection‹guarded sets
›
definition GuardK ::
"nat \ key set \ msg set \ bool" where
"GuardK n Ks H \ \X. X \ H \ X \ guardK n Ks"
subsection‹basic facts about
🍋‹GuardK
››
lemma GuardK_empty [iff]:
"GuardK n Ks {}"
by (simp add: GuardK_def)
lemma Key_notin_kparts [simplified]:
"GuardK n Ks H \ Key n \ kparts H"
by (auto simp: GuardK_def dest: in_kparts Key_notin_kparts_msg)
lemma GuardK_must_decrypt:
"\GuardK n Ks H; Key n \ analz H\ \
∃K Y. Crypt K Y
∈ kparts H
∧ Key (invKey K)
∈ kparts H
"
apply (drule_tac P=
"\G. Key n \ G" in analz_pparts_kparts_substD, simp)
by (drule must_decrypt, auto dest: Key_notin_kparts)
lemma GuardK_kparts [intro]:
"GuardK n Ks H \ GuardK n Ks (kparts H)"
by (auto simp: GuardK_def dest: in_kparts guardK_kparts)
lemma GuardK_mono:
"\GuardK n Ks H; G \ H\ \ GuardK n Ks G"
by (auto simp: GuardK_def)
lemma GuardK_insert [iff]:
"GuardK n Ks (insert X H)
= (GuardK n Ks H
∧ X
∈ guardK n Ks)
"
by (auto simp: GuardK_def)
lemma GuardK_Un [iff]:
"GuardK n Ks (G Un H) = (GuardK n Ks G & GuardK n Ks H)"
by (auto simp: GuardK_def)
lemma GuardK_synth [intro]:
"GuardK n Ks G \ GuardK n Ks (synth G)"
by (auto simp: GuardK_def, erule synth.induct, auto)
lemma GuardK_analz [intro]:
"\GuardK n Ks G; \K. K \ Ks \ Key K \ analz G\
==> GuardK n Ks (analz G)
"
apply (auto simp: GuardK_def)
apply (erule analz.induct, auto)
by (ind_cases
"Crypt K Xa \ guardK n Ks" for K Xa, auto)
lemma in_GuardK [dest]:
"\X \ G; GuardK n Ks G\ \ X \ guardK n Ks"
by (auto simp: GuardK_def)
lemma in_synth_GuardK:
"\X \ synth G; GuardK n Ks G\ \ X \ guardK n Ks"
by (drule GuardK_synth, auto)
lemma in_analz_GuardK:
"\X \ analz G; GuardK n Ks G;
∀K. K
∈ Ks
⟶ Key K
∉ analz G
] ==> X
∈ guardK n Ks
"
by (drule GuardK_analz, auto)
lemma GuardK_keyset [simp]:
"\keyset G; Key n \ G\ \ GuardK n Ks G"
by (simp only: GuardK_def, clarify, drule keyset_in, auto)
lemma GuardK_Un_keyset:
"\GuardK n Ks G; keyset H; Key n \ H\
==> GuardK n Ks (G Un H)
"
by auto
lemma in_GuardK_kparts:
"\X \ G; GuardK n Ks G; Y \ kparts {X}\ \ Y \ guardK n Ks"
by blast
lemma in_GuardK_kparts_neq:
"\X \ G; GuardK n Ks G; Key n' \ kparts {X}\
==> n
≠ n
'"
by (blast dest: in_GuardK_kparts)
lemma in_GuardK_kparts_Crypt:
"\X \ G; GuardK n Ks G; is_MPair X;
Crypt K Y
∈ kparts {X}; Key n
∈ kparts {Y}
] ==> invKey K
∈ Ks
"
apply (drule in_GuardK, simp)
apply (frule guardK_not_guardK, simp+)
apply (drule guardK_kparts, simp)
by (ind_cases
"Crypt K Y \ guardK n Ks", auto)
lemma GuardK_extand:
"\GuardK n Ks G; Ks \ Ks';
[K
∈ Ks
'; K \ Ks\ \ Key K \ parts G\ \ GuardK n Ks' G
"
by (auto simp: GuardK_def dest: guardK_extand parts_sub)
subsection‹set obtained
by decrypting a message
›
abbreviation (input)
decrypt ::
"msg set \ key \ msg \ msg set" where
"decrypt H K Y \ insert Y (H - {Crypt K Y})"
lemma analz_decrypt:
"\Crypt K Y \ H; Key (invKey K) \ H; Key n \ analz H\
==> Key n
∈ analz (decrypt H K Y)
"
apply (drule_tac P=
"\H. Key n \ analz H" in ssubst [OF insert_Diff])
apply assumption
apply (simp only: analz_Crypt_if, simp)
done
lemma parts_decrypt:
"\Crypt K Y \ H; X \ parts (decrypt H K Y)\ \ X \ parts H"
by (erule parts.induct, auto intro: parts.Fst parts.Snd parts.Body)
subsection‹number of Crypt
's in a message\
fun crypt_nb ::
"msg => nat" where
"crypt_nb (Crypt K X) = Suc (crypt_nb X)" |
"crypt_nb \X,Y\ = crypt_nb X + crypt_nb Y" |
"crypt_nb X = 0" (* otherwise *)
subsection‹basic facts about
🍋‹crypt_nb
››
lemma non_empty_crypt_msg:
"Crypt K Y \ parts {X} \ crypt_nb X \ 0"
by (induct X, simp_all, safe, simp_all)
subsection‹number of Crypt
's in a message list\
primrec cnb ::
"msg list => nat" where
"cnb [] = 0" |
"cnb (X#l) = crypt_nb X + cnb l"
subsection‹basic facts about
🍋‹cnb
››
lemma cnb_app [simp]:
"cnb (l @ l') = cnb l + cnb l'"
by (induct l, auto)
lemma mem_cnb_minus:
"x \ set l \ cnb l = crypt_nb x + (cnb l - crypt_nb x)"
by (induct l, auto)
lemmas mem_cnb_minus_substI = mem_cnb_minus [
THEN ssubst]
lemma cnb_minus [simp]:
"x \ set l \ cnb (remove l x) = cnb l - crypt_nb x"
apply (induct l, auto)
by (erule_tac l=l
and x=x
in mem_cnb_minus_substI, simp)
lemma parts_cnb:
"Z \ parts (set l) \
cnb l = (cnb l - crypt_nb Z) + crypt_nb Z
"
by (erule parts.induct, auto simp: in_set_conv_decomp)
lemma non_empty_crypt:
"Crypt K Y \ parts (set l) \ cnb l \ 0"
by (induct l, auto dest: non_empty_crypt_msg parts_insert_substD)
subsection‹list of kparts
›
lemma kparts_msg_set:
"\l. kparts {X} = set l \ cnb l = crypt_nb X"
apply (induct X, simp_all)
apply (rename_tac agent, rule_tac x=
"[Agent agent]" in exI, simp)
apply (rename_tac nat, rule_tac x=
"[Number nat]" in exI, simp)
apply (rename_tac nat, rule_tac x=
"[Nonce nat]" in exI, simp)
apply (rename_tac nat, rule_tac x=
"[Key nat]" in exI, simp)
apply (rule_tac x=
"[Hash X]" in exI, simp)
apply (clarify, rule_tac x=
"l@la" in exI, simp)
by (clarify, rename_tac nat X y, rule_tac x=
"[Crypt nat X]" in exI, simp)
lemma kparts_set:
"\l'. kparts (set l) = set l' & cnb l' = cnb l"
apply (induct l)
apply (rule_tac x=
"[]" in exI, simp, clarsimp)
apply (rename_tac a b l
')
apply (subgoal_tac
"\l''. kparts {a} = set l'' & cnb l'' = crypt_nb a", clarify)
apply (rule_tac x=
"l''@l'" in exI, simp)
apply (rule kparts_insert_substI, simp)
by (rule kparts_msg_set)
subsection‹list corresponding
to "decrypt"›
definition decrypt
' :: "msg list => key => msg => msg list" where
"decrypt' l K Y == Y # remove l (Crypt K Y)"
declare decrypt
'_def [simp]
subsection‹basic facts about
🍋‹decrypt
'\\
lemma decrypt_minus:
"decrypt (set l) K Y <= set (decrypt' l K Y)"
by (induct l, auto)
text‹if the analysis of a finite guarded set gives n
then it must
also give
one of the keys of Ks
›
lemma GuardK_invKey_by_list [rule_format]:
"\l. cnb l = p
⟶ GuardK n Ks (set l)
⟶ Key n
∈ analz (set l)
⟶ (
∃K. K
∈ Ks
∧ Key K
∈ analz (set l))
"
apply (induct p)
(* case p=0 *)
apply (clarify, drule GuardK_must_decrypt, simp, clarify)
apply (drule kparts_parts, drule non_empty_crypt, simp)
(* case p>0 *)
apply (clarify, frule GuardK_must_decrypt, simp, clarify)
apply (drule_tac P=
"\G. Key n \ G" in analz_pparts_kparts_substD, simp)
apply (frule analz_decrypt, simp_all)
apply (subgoal_tac
"\l'. kparts (set l) = set l' \ cnb l' = cnb l", clarsimp)
apply (drule_tac G=
"insert Y (set l' - {Crypt K Y})"
and H=
"set (decrypt' l' K Y)" in analz_sub, rule decrypt_minus)
apply (rule_tac analz_pparts_kparts_substI, simp)
apply (case_tac
"K \ invKey`Ks")
(* K:invKey`Ks *)
apply (clarsimp, blast)
(* K ~:invKey`Ks *)
apply (subgoal_tac
"GuardK n Ks (set (decrypt' l' K Y))")
apply (drule_tac x=
"decrypt' l' K Y" in spec, simp)
apply (subgoal_tac
"Crypt K Y \ parts (set l)")
apply (drule parts_cnb, rotate_tac -1, simp)
apply (clarify, drule_tac X=
"Key Ka" and H=
"insert Y (set l')" in analz_sub)
apply (rule insert_mono, rule set_remove)
apply (simp add: analz_insertD, blast)
(* Crypt K Y:parts (set l) *)
apply (blast dest: kparts_parts)
(* GuardK n Ks (set (decrypt' l' K Y)) *)
apply (rule_tac H=
"insert Y (set l')" in GuardK_mono)
apply (subgoal_tac
"GuardK n Ks (set l')", simp)
apply (rule_tac K=K
in guardK_Crypt, simp add: GuardK_def, simp)
apply (drule_tac t=
"set l'" in sym, simp)
apply (rule GuardK_kparts, simp, simp)
apply (rule_tac B=
"set l'" in subset_trans, rule set_remove, blast)
by (rule kparts_set)
lemma GuardK_invKey_finite:
"\Key n \ analz G; GuardK n Ks G; finite G\
==> ∃K. K
∈ Ks
∧ Key K
∈ analz G
"
apply (drule finite_list, clarify)
by (rule GuardK_invKey_by_list, auto)
lemma GuardK_invKey:
"\Key n \ analz G; GuardK n Ks G\
==> ∃K. K
∈ Ks
∧ Key K
∈ analz G
"
by (auto dest: analz_needs_only_finite GuardK_invKey_finite)
text‹if the analyse of a finite guarded set
and a (possibly infinite) set of
keys gives n
then it must
also gives Ks
›
lemma GuardK_invKey_keyset:
"\Key n \ analz (G \ H); GuardK n Ks G; finite G;
keyset H; Key n
∉ H
] ==> ∃K. K
∈ Ks
∧ Key K
∈ analz (G
∪ H)
"
apply (frule_tac P=
"\G. Key n \ G" and G=G
in analz_keyset_substD, simp_all)
apply (drule_tac G=
"G Un (H Int keysfor G)" in GuardK_invKey_finite)
apply (auto simp: GuardK_def intro: analz_sub)
by (drule keyset_in, auto)
end