<h4>3.1 <span class="Heading">Notation and definitions</span></h4>
<p>Let <span class="SimpleMath">\(G\)</span> be a group and <span class="SimpleMath">\(F\)</span> a field. Then the <em>group algebra</em> <span class="SimpleMath">\(FG\)</span> consists of the set of formal linear combinations of the form</p>
<p class="center">\[
\sum_{g \in G}\alpha_g g,\qquad \alpha_g \in F
\]</p>
<p>where all but finitely many of the <span class="SimpleMath">\(\alpha_g\)</span> are zero. The group algebra <span class="SimpleMath">\(FG\)</span> is an <span class="SimpleMath">\(F\)</span>-algebra with the obvious operations. Clearly, <span class="SimpleMath">\(\dim FG=|G|\)</span>.</p>
<p>The <em>augmentation homomorphism</em> <span class="SimpleMath">\( \chi : FG \rightarrow F\)</span> is defined by</p>
<p>It is easy to see that <span class="SimpleMath">\(\chi\)</span> is indeed a homomorphism onto <span class="SimpleMath">\(F\)</span>. The kernel of <span class="SimpleMath">\(\chi\)</span> is called the <em>augmentation ideal</em> of <span class="SimpleMath">\(FG\)</span>. The augmentation ideal is denoted <span class="SimpleMath">\(A(FG)\)</span>, or simply <span class="SimpleMath">\(A\)</span> when there is no danger of confusion. It follows from the isomorphism theorems that <span class="SimpleMath">\(\dim A(FG)=\dim FG-1=|G|-1\)</span>. Another way to write the augmentation ideal is</p>
<p>An invertible element of <span class="SimpleMath">\(FG\)</span> is said to be a <em>unit</em>. Clearly the elements of <span class="SimpleMath">\(G\)</span> and the non-zero elements of <span class="SimpleMath">\(F\)</span> are units. The set of units in <span class="SimpleMath">\(FG\)</span> is a group with respect to the multiplication of <span class="SimpleMath">\(FG\)</span>. The <em>unit group</em> of <span class="SimpleMath">\(FG\)</span> is denoted <span class="SimpleMath">\(U(FG)\)</span> or simply <span class="SimpleMath">\(U\)</span> when there is no risk of confusion. A unit <span class="SimpleMath">\(u\)</span> is said to be <em>normalised</em> if <span class="SimpleMath">\(\chi(u)=1\)</span>. The set of normalised units forms a subgroup of the unit group, and is referred to as the <em>normalised unit group</em>. The normalised unit group of <span class="SimpleMath">\(FG\)</span> is denoted <span class="SimpleMath">\(V(FG)\)</span>, or simply <span class="SimpleMath">\(V\)</span>. It is easy to prove that <span class="SimpleMath">\(U(FG) = F^* \times V(FG)\)</span> where <span class="SimpleMath">\(F^*\)</span> denotes the multiplicative group of <span class="SimpleMath">\(F\)</span>.</p>
<h4>3.2 <span class="Heading"><span class="SimpleMath">\(p\)</span>-modular group algebras</span></h4>
<p>A group algebra <span class="SimpleMath">\(FG\)</span> is said to be <span class="SimpleMath">\(p\)</span>-modular if <span class="SimpleMath">\(F\)</span> is the field of characteristic <span class="SimpleMath">\(p\)</span>, and <span class="SimpleMath">\(G\)</span> is a finite <span class="SimpleMath">\(p\)</span>-group. A lot of information about the structure of <span class="SimpleMath">\(p\)</span>-modular group algebras can be found in <a href="chapBib_mj.html#biBHB">[HB82, Chapter VIII]</a>. In a <span class="SimpleMath">\(p\)</span>-modular group algebra we have that an element <span class="SimpleMath">\(u\)</span> is a unit if and only if <span class="SimpleMath">\(\chi(u)\neq 0\)</span>. Hence the normalised unit group <span class="SimpleMath">\(V\)</span> consists of all elements of <span class="SimpleMath">\(FG\)</span> with augmentation <span class="SimpleMath">\(1\)</span>. In other words <span class="SimpleMath">\(V\)</span> is a coset of the augmentation ideal, namely <span class="SimpleMath">\(V=1+A\)</span>. This also implies that <span class="SimpleMath">\(|V|=|A|=|F|^{|G|-1}\)</span>, and so <span class="SimpleMath">\(V\)</span> is a finite <span class="SimpleMath">\(p\)</span>-group.</p>
java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 0 out of bounds for length 0
<p></pan>
<h4>3.3 <span class="Heading">Polycyclic generating set for <span class="SimpleMath">\(V\)</span></span><java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 66 out of bounds for length 66
pjava.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Range [9, 8) out of bounds for length 20
<p>It is clear that a quotient <span class="SimpleMath">\(A^i/A^{i+1}\)</span>of this chain has trivial multiplication, that is, such a quotient is a java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 152 out of bounds for length 0
<p>be the <em>Jennings series</em> of <span <p>Oneof the aims the <strong class="pkg">LAGUNA</strong> package is to compute a power-commutator presentationjava.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 0 out of bounds for length 0
<p>A non-empty product</p>
<p class="center">\[
u=(x_{1,1}-1)^{\alpha_{1,1}}\cdots(x_{1,java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 42 out of bounds for length 0
({1-1^\alpha_{,}\dots(x_{,_}-1){\alpha_kl_k}}
\]</p>
<p>where <span class="SimpleMath">\(0\leq \alpha_{i,j}\leq p-1\)</span> is said to java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Range [0, 85) out of bounds for length 0
< class""\
\p>It that a quotient <pan ="impleMath>\A^ii1\/span> this chain multiplication, , a quotient is anilr. The chain < class=SimpleMath>(^i\<span givesriseto a series normal subgroups in <span class""\(V\)<span:/>
\]</< =""\[
<p>A basis for <span class="SimpleMath">\(A\)</span> consisting of java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 70 out of bounds for length 0
<p>Let <span class="SimpleMath">\(x_1,\ldots,x_{{|G|}-1}\)</span> denote the standard products where we choose the indices java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 0 out of bounds for length 0
<p class <em>Jennings </m> of<span ="impleMath>\G\)/>.That , <span class=SimpleMath>({i+}[_i,G]_j^p}\)<span> where<span class=SimpleMath">\(\<span> is the smallest -negative integer that <pan class=SimpleMath">(j\eq /\)/> <span ="impleMath"\i\ \)/>select elements <pan class="SimpleMath">\(x_{i,1},\ldots,x_{i,l_i}\)</span> of <span class="SimpleMath">\(G_i\)</span> such that <span class="SimpleMath">\(\{x_{i,1}G_{i+1},\ldots,x_{java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 1 out of bounds for length 0
v=y_1^{\alpha_1}\cdots]/>
\alpha_1,\ldots,\alpha_{|G|-1} \in \{0,\ldots,p-1\}.
\]</p>
<p>This expression is called the <em>canonical form</em> of
<d=X7DCB12F48752C17E ="7DCB12F48752C17E<a>/>
<h4>3<pThetotalnumber standard products <pan =SimpleMath"(G|1)/> .<pjava.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 91 out of bounds for length 91
<p>We show how to compute the canonical form of a normalised unit with respect to the polycyclic generating set <span class=
<p><strong java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 16 out of bounds for length 0
<p class="center">\[
w\equiv \alpha_{s_i}x_{s_i}+\cdots+\alpha_{r_i}x_{r_i}\quad \bmodjava.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 0 out of bounds for length 0
\<
<pclass"">[ 1+w\equivpT expression is called the <em>canonical form</em> of <span class="SimpleMath">\(v\)<java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 0 out of bounds for length 0
\uad A{+}java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 16 out of bounds for length 16
\<pjava.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 6 out of bounds for length 6
<p>Suppose that <span class="SimpleMath">\(w\)</span> is an element of the augmentation ideal <span class="SimpleMath">\(A\)</span> and <span class="SimpleMath">\(1+w\)</span> is a normalised unit. Let <span class="SimpleMath">\(x_1,\ldots,x_{r_1}\)</span> be the standard products of weight 1, and let <span class="SimpleMath">\(y_1,\ldots,y_{r_1}\)</span> be the corresponding elements in the polycyclic generating set. Then using the previous lemma, we find <span class="SimpleMath">\(\alpha_1,\ldots,\alpha_{r_1}\)</span> such that</p>
<p>Now we have that <span class="SimpleMath">\(1+w=(y_{1})^{\alpha_{1}}\cdots (y_{r_1})^{\alpha_{r_1}}(1+w_2)\)</span> for some <span class="SimpleMath">\(w_2 \in A^2\)</span>. Then suppose that <span class="SimpleMath">\(x_{s_2},x_{s_2+1},\ldots,x_{r_2}\)</span> are the standard products of weight 2. We find <span class="SimpleMath">\(\alpha_{s_2},\ldots,\alpha_{r_2}\)</span> such that</p>
<p>Thus <span class="SimpleMath">\(1+w_2=(y_{s_2})^{\alpha_{s_2}}\cdots (y_{r_2})^{\alpha_{r_2}}(1+w_3)\)</span> for some <span class="SimpleMath">\(w_3 \in A^3\)</span>, and so <span class="SimpleMath">\(1+w=(y_{1})^{\alpha_{1}}\cdots (y_{r_1})^{\alpha_{r_1}}(y_{s_2})^{\alpha_{s_2}}\cdots (y_{r_2})^{\alpha_{r_2}}(1+w_3)\)</span>. We repeat this process, and after <span class="SimpleMath">\(c\)</span> steps we obtain the canonical form for the element <span class="SimpleMath">\(1+w\)</span>.</p>
<h4>3.5 <span class="Heading">Computing a power commutator presentation for <span class="SimpleMath">\(V\)</span></span></h4>
<p>Using the procedure in the previous section, it is easy to compute a power commutator presentation for the normalized unit group <span class="SimpleMath">\(V\)</span> of a <span class="SimpleMath">\(p\)</span>-modular group algebra over the field of <span class="SimpleMath">\(p\)</span> elements. First we compute the polycyclic generating sequence <span class="SimpleMath">\(y_1,\ldots,y_{|G|-1}\)</span> as in Section <a href="chap3_mj.html#X7B74767A849D921E"><span class="RefLink">3.3</span></a>. Then for each <span class="SimpleMath">\(y_i\)</span> and for each <span class="SimpleMath">\(y_j,\ y_i\)</span> such that <span class="SimpleMath">\(i<j\)</span> we compute the canonical form for <span class="SimpleMath">\(y_i^p\)</span> and <span class="SimpleMath">\([y_j,y_i]\)</span> as described in Section <a href="chap3_mj.html#X7DCB12F48752C17E"><span class="RefLink">3.4</span></a>.</p>
<p>Once a power-commutator presentation for <span class="SimpleMath">\(V\)</span> is constructed, it is easy to obtain a polycyclic presentation for the unit group <span class="SimpleMath">\(U\)</span> by adding an extra central generator <span class="SimpleMath">\(y\)</span> corresponding to a generator of the cyclic group <span class="SimpleMath">\(F^*\)</span> and enforcing that <span class="SimpleMath">\(y^{p-1}=1\)</span>.</p>
<h4>3.6 <span class="Heading">Verifying Lie properties of <span class="SimpleMath">\(FG\)</span></span></h4>
<p>If <span class="SimpleMath">\(FG\)</span> is a group algebra then one can consider the Lie bracket operation defined by <span class="SimpleMath">\([a,b]=ab-ba\)</span>. Then it is well-known that <span class="SimpleMath">\(FG\)</span> with respect to the scalar multiplication, the addition, and the bracket operation becomes a Lie algebra over <span class="SimpleMath">\(F\)</span>. This Lie algebra is also denoted <span class="SimpleMath">\(FG\)</span>. Some Lie properties of such Lie algebras can be computed very efficiently. In particular, it can be verified whether the Lie algebra <span class="SimpleMath">\(FG\)</span> is nilpotent, soluble, metabelian, centre-by-metabelian. Fast algorithms that achieve these goals are described in <a href="chapBib_mj.html#biBLR86">[LR86]</a>, <a href="chapBib_mj.html#biBPPS73">[PPS73]</a>, and <a href="chapBib_mj.html#biBRos00">[Ros00]</a>.</p>
¤ Die Informationen auf dieser Webseite wurden
nach bestem Wissen sorgfältig zusammengestellt. Es wird jedoch weder Vollständigkeit, noch Richtigkeit,
noch Qualität der bereit gestellten Informationen zugesichert.0.228Bemerkung:
¤
Die Informationen auf dieser Webseite wurden
nach bestem Wissen sorgfältig zusammengestellt. Es wird jedoch weder Vollständigkeit, noch Richtigkeit,
noch Qualität der bereit gestellten Informationen zugesichert.
Bemerkung:
Die farbliche Syntaxdarstellung und die Messung sind noch experimentell.