SSL eytzinger.c Interaktion und Portierbarkeitunbekannt
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
#include "eytzinger.h"
/**
* is_aligned - is this pointer & size okay for word - wide copying ?
* @ base : pointer to data
* @ size : size of each element
* @ align : required alignment ( typically 4 or 8 )
*
* Returns true if elements can be copied using word loads and stores .
* The size must be a multiple of the alignment , and the base address must
* be if we do not have CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS .
*
* For some reason , gcc doesn ' t know to optimize " if ( a & mask | | b & mask ) "
* to " if ( ( a | b ) & mask ) " , so we do that by hand .
*/
__attribute_const__ __always_inline
static bool is_aligned(const void *base, size_t size, unsigned char align)
{
unsigned char lsbits = (unsigned char )size;
(void )base;
#ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
lsbits |= (unsigned char )(uintptr_t)base;
#endif
return (lsbits & (align - 1 )) == 0 ;
}
/**
* swap_words_32 - swap two elements in 32 - bit chunks
* @ a : pointer to the first element to swap
* @ b : pointer to the second element to swap
* @ n : element size ( must be a multiple of 4 )
*
* Exchange the two objects in memory . This exploits base + index addressing ,
* which basically all CPUs have , to minimize loop overhead computations .
*
* For some reason , on x86 gcc 7 . 3 . 0 adds a redundant test of n at the
* bottom of the loop , even though the zero flag is still valid from the
* subtract ( since the intervening mov instructions don ' t alter the flags ) .
* Gcc 8 . 1 . 0 doesn ' t have that problem .
*/
static void swap_words_32(void *a, void *b, size_t n)
{
do {
u32 t = *(u32 *)(a + (n -= 4 ));
*(u32 *)(a + n) = *(u32 *)(b + n);
*(u32 *)(b + n) = t;
} while (n);
}
/**
* swap_words_64 - swap two elements in 64 - bit chunks
* @ a : pointer to the first element to swap
* @ b : pointer to the second element to swap
* @ n : element size ( must be a multiple of 8 )
*
* Exchange the two objects in memory . This exploits base + index
* addressing , which basically all CPUs have , to minimize loop overhead
* computations .
*
* We ' d like to use 64 - bit loads if possible . If they ' re not , emulating
* one requires base + index + 4 addressing which x86 has but most other
* processors do not . If CONFIG_64BIT , we definitely have 64 - bit loads ,
* but it ' s possible to have 64 - bit loads without 64 - bit pointers ( e . g .
* x32 ABI ) . Are there any cases the kernel needs to worry about ?
*/
static void swap_words_64(void *a, void *b, size_t n)
{
do {
#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
u64 t = *(u64 *)(a + (n -= 8 ));
*(u64 *)(a + n) = *(u64 *)(b + n);
*(u64 *)(b + n) = t;
#else
/* Use two 32-bit transfers to avoid base+index+4 addressing */
u32 t = *(u32 *)(a + (n -= 4 ));
*(u32 *)(a + n) = *(u32 *)(b + n);
*(u32 *)(b + n) = t;
t = *(u32 *)(a + (n -= 4 ));
*(u32 *)(a + n) = *(u32 *)(b + n);
*(u32 *)(b + n) = t;
#endif
} while (n);
}
/**
* swap_bytes - swap two elements a byte at a time
* @ a : pointer to the first element to swap
* @ b : pointer to the second element to swap
* @ n : element size
*
* This is the fallback if alignment doesn ' t allow using larger chunks .
*/
static void swap_bytes(void *a, void *b, size_t n)
{
do {
char t = ((char *)a)[--n];
((char *)a)[n] = ((char *)b)[n];
((char *)b)[n] = t;
} while (n);
}
/*
* The values are arbitrary as long as they can ' t be confused with
* a pointer , but small integers make for the smallest compare
* instructions .
*/
#define SWAP_WORDS_64 (swap_r_func_t)0
#define SWAP_WORDS_32 (swap_r_func_t)1
#define SWAP_BYTES (swap_r_func_t)2
#define SWAP_WRAPPER (swap_r_func_t)3
struct wrapper {
cmp_func_t cmp;
swap_func_t swap_func;
};
/*
* The function pointer is last to make tail calls most efficient if the
* compiler decides not to inline this function .
*/
static void do_swap(void *a, void *b, size_t size, swap_r_func_t swap_func, const void *priv)
{
if (swap_func == SWAP_WRAPPER) {
((const struct wrapper *)priv)->swap_func(a, b, (int )size);
return ;
}
if (swap_func == SWAP_WORDS_64)
swap_words_64(a, b, size);
else if (swap_func == SWAP_WORDS_32)
swap_words_32(a, b, size);
else if (swap_func == SWAP_BYTES)
swap_bytes(a, b, size);
else
swap_func(a, b, (int )size, priv);
}
#define _CMP_WRAPPER ((cmp_r_func_t)0 L)
static int do_cmp(const void *a, const void *b, cmp_r_func_t cmp, const void *priv)
{
if (cmp == _CMP_WRAPPER)
return ((const struct wrapper *)priv)->cmp(a, b);
return cmp(a, b, priv);
}
static inline int eytzinger1_do_cmp(void *base1, size_t n, size_t size,
cmp_r_func_t cmp_func, const void *priv,
size_t l, size_t r)
{
return do_cmp(base1 + inorder_to_eytzinger1(l, n) * size,
base1 + inorder_to_eytzinger1(r, n) * size,
cmp_func, priv);
}
static inline void eytzinger1_do_swap(void *base1, size_t n, size_t size,
swap_r_func_t swap_func, const void *priv,
size_t l, size_t r)
{
do_swap(base1 + inorder_to_eytzinger1(l, n) * size,
base1 + inorder_to_eytzinger1(r, n) * size,
size, swap_func, priv);
}
static void eytzinger1_sort_r(void *base1, size_t n, size_t size,
cmp_r_func_t cmp_func,
swap_r_func_t swap_func,
const void *priv)
{
unsigned i, j, k;
/* called from 'sort' without swap function, let's pick the default */
if (swap_func == SWAP_WRAPPER && !((struct wrapper *)priv)->swap_func)
swap_func = NULL;
if (!swap_func) {
if (is_aligned(base1, size, 8 ))
swap_func = SWAP_WORDS_64;
else if (is_aligned(base1, size, 4 ))
swap_func = SWAP_WORDS_32;
else
swap_func = SWAP_BYTES;
}
/* heapify */
for (i = n / 2 ; i >= 1 ; --i) {
/* Find the sift-down path all the way to the leaves. */
for (j = i; k = j * 2 , k < n;)
j = eytzinger1_do_cmp(base1, n, size, cmp_func, priv, k, k + 1 ) > 0 ? k : k + 1 ;
/* Special case for the last leaf with no sibling. */
if (j * 2 == n)
j *= 2 ;
/* Backtrack to the correct location. */
while (j != i && eytzinger1_do_cmp(base1, n, size, cmp_func, priv, i, j) >= 0 )
j /= 2 ;
/* Shift the element into its correct place. */
for (k = j; j != i;) {
j /= 2 ;
eytzinger1_do_swap(base1, n, size, swap_func, priv, j, k);
}
}
/* sort */
for (i = n; i > 1 ; --i) {
eytzinger1_do_swap(base1, n, size, swap_func, priv, 1 , i);
/* Find the sift-down path all the way to the leaves. */
for (j = 1 ; k = j * 2 , k + 1 < i;)
j = eytzinger1_do_cmp(base1, n, size, cmp_func, priv, k, k + 1 ) > 0 ? k : k + 1 ;
/* Special case for the last leaf with no sibling. */
if (j * 2 + 1 == i)
j *= 2 ;
/* Backtrack to the correct location. */
while (j >= 1 && eytzinger1_do_cmp(base1, n, size, cmp_func, priv, 1 , j) >= 0 )
j /= 2 ;
/* Shift the element into its correct place. */
for (k = j; j > 1 ;) {
j /= 2 ;
eytzinger1_do_swap(base1, n, size, swap_func, priv, j, k);
}
}
}
void eytzinger0_sort_r(void *base, size_t n, size_t size,
cmp_r_func_t cmp_func,
swap_r_func_t swap_func,
const void *priv)
{
void *base1 = base - size;
return eytzinger1_sort_r(base1, n, size, cmp_func, swap_func, priv);
}
void eytzinger0_sort(void *base, size_t n, size_t size,
cmp_func_t cmp_func,
swap_func_t swap_func)
{
struct wrapper w = {
.cmp = cmp_func,
.swap_func = swap_func,
};
return eytzinger0_sort_r(base, n, size, _CMP_WRAPPER, SWAP_WRAPPER, &w);
}
#if 0
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/random.h>
#include <linux/ktime.h>
static u64 cmp_count;
static int mycmp(const void *a, const void *b)
{
u32 _a = *(u32 *)a;
u32 _b = *(u32 *)b;
cmp_count++;
if (_a < _b)
return -1 ;
else if (_a > _b)
return 1 ;
else
return 0 ;
}
static int test(void )
{
size_t N, i;
ktime_t start, end;
s64 delta;
u32 *arr;
for (N = 10000 ; N <= 100000 ; N += 10000 ) {
arr = kmalloc_array(N, sizeof (u32), GFP_KERNEL);
cmp_count = 0 ;
for (i = 0 ; i < N; i++)
arr[i] = get_random_u32();
start = ktime_get();
eytzinger0_sort(arr, N, sizeof (u32), mycmp, NULL);
end = ktime_get();
delta = ktime_us_delta(end, start);
printk(KERN_INFO "time: %lld\n" , delta);
printk(KERN_INFO "comparisons: %lld\n" , cmp_count);
u32 prev = 0 ;
eytzinger0_for_each(i, N) {
if (prev > arr[i])
goto err;
prev = arr[i];
}
kfree(arr);
}
return 0 ;
err:
kfree(arr);
return -1 ;
}
#endif
Messung V0.5 in Prozent C=95 H=76 G=85
[Verzeichnis aufwärts0.15unsichere VerbindungÜbersetzung europäischer Sprachen durch Browser2026-09-29]
2026-10-10
Neuigkeiten
Aktuelles
Motto des Tages
Open Source Software
Jenseits des Üblichen ....
Besucherstatistik
Statistik
#Sources=1126864
#Domains=1897691